Light-Speed Travel Break Through - (and Future Space Tech)

I am always interested when people say things which are de rigeur, but for which they have no evidence. Such is your comment, “Also, (that ) the sun revolved around the earth”.
Sir Fred Hoyle, admittedly a “maverick astronomer”, and also an atheist, but also someone who spent a professional lifetime studying and contemplating these things, stated that there was no way to disentangle the two possibilities, one, that the earth revolves around the sun, and two, that the reverse is the case.
So it is fascinating that you have solved a problem which he was unable to address.
My own belief, which is primarily dictated by the words of scripture, which repeatedly states such things as, “The world also is firmly established, it shall not be moved”, is also based on the observation that, if the world is spinning on an axis, as we are told, then it rotates at 1000 mph at the equator in order to give us day and night. But as it is covered with water, this should mean that the water is subject to the force of inertia, ie, that it will attempt to lag behind as earth spins; in short order, this lagging behind will generate “the mother of all tsunamis”. But this is not what we see. Neither do we see the unidirectional hurricanes which should occur for exactly the same reason.
Thus, simple logic, accepted in other areas of physics, is being denied and/or ignored in this instance; perhaps because it would be inconvenient to acknowledge it.
The corollaries of this are enormous.
If the world is neither spinning nor rotating around the sun, then the stars which we see apparently moving across the sky each night, are in fact moving. If they are moving, then in order to circle us every 24 hours, they must be a great deal closer to us than we have been told. If both sun and stars both keep in synch with each other as they circle us, which is clearly the case, then they are both focused on us here on earth; ie we are the reason why this synchronization occurs. This fact deals a death-blow to our supposed insignificance in the universe. I have always been extremely sceptical about being told that the nearest star is “4 light years” away; if this is the case, then the inverse square law, according to which light dissipates, should render a-Centauri invisible to us; and certainly, other far more remote stars.
If you imagine that the seasons can only be generated by an earth rotating around the sun at an angle to it; not so. All that needs to happen is that the sun rotates around us in an orbit which displays an up-and-down trajectory; thus the N hemisphere of earth is strongly irradiated during that hemisphere’s summer, and vice versa.
The phenomenon and theory of Red Shift, according to which the stars are receding from us at speeds approaching that of light, was strongly challenged as to this interpretation by its discoverer, Edwin Hubble. Thus he questioned the expansion of the universe, and therefore by definition, the Big Bang. It turns out that the BB theory was first promulgated in the 16th century by certain Kabbalist ie mystically-oriented rabbis; the rabbis are the descendants of the Pharisees, ie those who hated and condemned Christ to death.
Time is short, but I hope you are beginning to get the beginnings of understanding as to why we are taught the things which we are taught.
The Age of Enlightenment was actually the beginning of an Age of Darkness brought about by attempting to refute the simple Word of God, which is the touchstone of all truth. Science has never recovered from this abandoning of the truth. Astrophysics is today, for various reasons, in the mother of all messes.
“Professing themselves to be wise, ( as Paul says ) they became fools”.