Is It A Star Or A Planet? Coldest Brown Dwarfs Blur Lines between Stars and Planets
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
A new study shows that while these brown dwarfs, sometimes called failed stars, are indeed the coldest known free-floating celestial bodies, they are warmer than previously thought with temperatures about 250-350 degrees Fahrenheit.
To reach such low surface temperatures after cooling for billions of years means that these objects can only have about 5 to 20 times the mass of Jupiter. Unlike the Sun, these objects’ only source of energy is from their gravitational contraction, which depends directly on their mass.
“If one of these objects were found orbiting a star, there is a good chance that it would be called a planet,” says Trent Dupuy, a Hubble Fellow at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. But because they probably formed on their own and not in a proto-planetary disk, astronomers still call these objects brown dwarfs even if they are “planetary mass.”
Characterizing these cold brown dwarfs is challenging because they emit most of their light at infrared wavelengths, and they are very faint due to their small size and low temperature.
To get accurate temperatures, astronomers need to know the distances to these objects. “We wanted to find out if they were colder, fainter, and nearby or if they were warmer, brighter, and more distant,” explains Dupuy. Using NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope, the team determined that the brown dwarfs in question are located at distances 20 to 50 light-years away.
To determine the distances to these objects the team measured their parallax – the apparent change in position against background stars over time. As the Spitzer Space Telescope orbits the Sun its perspective changes and nearby objects appear to shift back and forth slightly. The same effect occurs if you hold up a finger in front of your face and close one eye and then the other. The position of your finger seems to shift when viewed against the distant background.
But even for these relatively nearby brown dwarfs, the parallax motion is small. “To be able to determine accurate distances, our measurements had to be the same precision as knowing the position of a firefly to within 1 inch from 200 miles away,” explains Adam Kraus, professor at the University of Texas at Austin and the other author of the study.
Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
The new data also present new puzzles to astronomers that study cool, planet-like atmospheres. Unlike warmer brown dwarfs and stars, the observable properties of these objects don’t seem to correlate as strongly with temperature. This suggests increased roles for other factors, such as convective mixing, in driving the chemistry at the surface. They also find evidence for disappearing alkali elements that are likely getting incorporated into noxious clouds.
This study examined the initial sample of the coldest brown dwarfs discovered in the WISE survey data. Additional objects discovered in the past two years remain to be studied and will hopefully shed light on some of these outstanding issues.
A paper describing these results, authored by Dupuy and Kraus, appears in the Sept. 5, 2013 issue of Science Express online.
Headquartered in Cambridge, Mass., the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) is a joint collaboration between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Harvard College Observatory. CfA scientists, organized into six research divisions, study the origin, evolution and ultimate fate of the universe.
Contacts and sources:
David A. Aguilar
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
LION'S MANE PRODUCT
Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules
Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.
Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.

Please, please, do not have the effrontery and sheer gall to tell me that an earth-based telescope, let alone an orbiting one, can determine an angular difference of one inch at 200 miles distance. Think about that claim for a moment. This is so ridiculous as to beggar belief. It tells us in the clearest possible terms, that these individuals are deliberate liars. The ability of any optical system to resolve discrete points is entirely to do with the distance apart of the individual detector cells; to have such resolving power, the cells would need to be less than nanometers apart, and with no cross-talk. And the intervening distance would need to be entirely free of refractive effects, or dust. And space is full of dust.
What we have here are people who are congenital liars, who know that the vast majority of people have not the slightest interest in what they are talking about, and even if they had some interest, they would never be able to decipher their gobbledegook. So they continue to apply for, and are rewarded with, research grants for ever more ridiculous “projects”. At our expense.
When one finally realises that the earth does not orbit the sun, but the reverse is true, then the whole story about parallax collapses in a heap. And in its ashes, those enormous distances to the stars. The truth is that the stars are actually orders of magnitude closer to us than these lunatics believe; as such, the universe is orders of magnitude younger as well. Leaving no time for “evolution” to have occurred, even if it were possible for information to arise out of chaos, which Information Theory tells us is impossible.
Thus we see that at its heart, “science” is actually a religious endeavour, scouring about for any insane theory which will enable its adherents to deny that
“In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth”.