Is it me or what?

 Copyright 2021, InterAmerica, Inc.

That alleged 1945 San Antonio flying saucer crash has reached a curious crisis stage: The Vallee/Harris book about it has been pushed back several weeks, my pal John Greenewald’s 2017/2020 presentation of the metallurgical analysis is being retrotted out, and my friend Kevin Randle is all over the incident, hoping to air an upcoming interview with Vallee (and Harris too, I think) about the book and the event.

Here’s the extensive link to John’s Black Vault piece on the metals:

https://www.theblackvault.com/casefiles/analysis-two-metallic-parts-purportedly-crashed-unidentified-aerial-object-san-antonio-new-mexico-august-16-1945/?fbclid=IwAR3uQfLYFXwWRPDoUPB3zYpTnBqvcuueE1sDJ5emxu-fYtmRJuKS9CooO3Q

And you can scoot over to Kevin’s blog for his erudite comments on the matter:

kevinrandle.blogspot.com

This odd account seems to have resurfaced because of the Vallee interest and book, but it’s not a very good flying saucer story, as I see it.

The supposed “debris” picked up by the boy witnesses looks mundane and is analytically mundane, one suggestion being that the debris is not alien or extraterrestrial but from Earth’s future, which explains why it is common and Earth-like. (Interesting, but a stretch)

The story was so incongruous that it became conflated, it seems, a while back into the so-called 1947 San Agustin episode. (Kevin deals with this at length.)

The 1945 account is cute — a fictional floozy thing. So why is it getting all the attention, including mine, here? 

I have no conjecture….none. It baffles me that the story is being ballyhooed all over the place and that Jacques Vallee is interested in it. (Has Jacques become senile? He is, after all, in his really senior years.)

Help me out here, won’t you? I’m puzzled — not that being puzzled isn’t usually my demeanor but in this instance I’m hoping someone in my circle can unpuzzle me.

RR

http://ufocon.blogspot.com – The UFO Iconoclast(s)