What is the ET essence?

Copyright 2021, InterAmerica, Inc.

I bought the book shown a few weeks ago. It’s about the God thesis – Intelligent Design.

I won’t get into that discussion here, as Dominick would be irritated, while a former regular here (Matty) and current thinker (Martin) would see the relevance of the idea.

What happened was that while UFOs have nothing to do with Stephen Meyer’s brilliant elucidation, UFOs can be factored into pertainency.

Here’s what I mean……

Life here, on Earth, has evolved so that in the animal kingdom (and maybe even the plant kingdom) entities – creatures (and botanicals) – exist to eat (survive), have sex (reproduce), secure territory, and among homo sapiens, recreate (sadly).

If UFOs are “manned” by extraterrestrials – I’m thinking that AI creations may be at the helm of UFOs – what are the methods or modalities of their existence?

UFO entities, if they are within or nearby their craft(s), what are the manifestations of their being? Survival? Sexual activity? Territorial integrity? Recreation?

After all, if they are part of a designed Universe or profound existence – as Dr. Meyer’s book suggests – what is the primary factor or factors for their existence; that is, what evolutionary modalities (instincts) control them?

 In all the UFO accounts I’ve read or studied, as you have, I’ve not seen one scintilla of purpose or existential (in the current use of that word) proclivity.

In UFO encounters – the gist or José Caravaca’s and Albert Rosales” writings – neither survival (food or sustenance), sexual pursuit (even during alleged abductions, where medical exams predominate, or territorial protections or collections occur.

In visual observations of UFOs, and even among UAP visuals, there is nothing to indicate that the phenomenon is like what Earth-like phenomena is, for containing living creatures or as structural aircraft or anything else similar to what is experienced in the human milieu.

Studying (researching) or testing UFOs (UAP also) requires a unique approach, and out-of-box thrust that I don’t see happening within ufological pursuit or among the mental abilities of anyone in the UFO community.

UFO people are dolts, most contained by the UFO past and without any sense of what UFOs might be or could be, inside the paranormal rubric.

UFOs for enthusiasts are phenomena they are familiar with. Putting UFOs to the test of creative conjecture irks UFO followers who want the phenomenon to be spacecraft of alien visitors or weird phenomena that won’t harm or enlighten them, stuck as they are in the familiar and encyclopedic past.

UFOs do not seek territory, do not have a sexual patina, and do not require survival elements, and they are not inclined to be recreational.

So what are they? Let’s all try to use our brains to find a clue or explanation. Is that asking too much?

RR

http://ufocon.blogspot.com – The UFO Iconoclast(s)