Martin Bormann -- Nazis Supplied Uranium for US Atom Bombs

“Death Object: Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax” https://www.amazon.com/dp/B071NGKY17/

I have looked at the evidence from Hiroshima and Nagasaki specifically in my book “Hiroshima revisited”

https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited/

Both the physical and the medical facts on the ground clearly disprove the tall tale of the atomic bombs. The people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were brutally killed alright, but the evidence shows that this was done with napalm and mustard gas, not with any atomic bombs.

Secondly, the Germans could not have supplied the enriched uranium, because they did not have the technology to produce it. They had no need for an atomic bomb, because they all along had something better that actually would have worked — namely, highly potent nerve gases (tabun, sarin, soman) of which one or a few milligram suffice to kill an adult human being. And they had large stockpiles. When I was doing my mandatory military service in West Germany in 1988/89, I learned that at that God-forsaken garrison they had a facility for the incineration of those stockpiles. That facility was still in continuous operation at the time and for some more years after that.

The first workable process to enrich uranium to bomb grade was developed by the Soviets, under the direction of German physicist Max Steenbeck, whom the Soviets had kidnapped as a civilian in 1945. That process (centrifugation) reached maturity only around 1950 or so. It was swiftly adopted in the West as soon as it became known.

One more word about those nerve gases: imagine what the Germans COULD have done with them — they could have filled up a few V1 or V2 rockets to the brim and sent them on their way to London. The result would certainly have been orders of magnitude worse than Dresden, Tokyo, or Hiroshima.

Now, why did they develop all that technology, and then did not use it? I only have a speculative answer to that: it may have been to maintain some measure of deterrence at a time when the US and England had gained total air superiority above the Reich. The detonations of V1 and V2 rockets filled with conventional explosives above London would then have been merely demonstrations of this capability to retaliate. Of note, the destruction of Dresden — by far the deadliest of all bombings in Germany — happened only after Pomerania, and with it the launching pads for the V1 and V2 rockets, had been overrun by the Soviets.

The fact remains that among all warring parties in WW2, Germany had the deadliest weapons by far, yet did not use them. Doesn’t fit the usual atrocity propaganda narrative, but it’s the truth nevertheless.

It is time to reconsider what really did or did not happen during WW2 — the evidence is there, one just has to look for it. In more recent times, everyone who dared to defy the globalists was branded “the New Hitler” — Putin of course, but also Qaddafi, Assad, Ahmadinejad, Erdogan, Putin, Lukashenko; the list goes on. What if Hitler simply was the first “New Hitler” and got tarred and feathered beyond all recognition, so as to make it absolutely impossible in polite society to discuss the things that he got right?