‘Non-Market’: The One Word That Blew Up The G20 Communiqué

On Tuesday we reported that China had derailed the G20′s joint communiqué in Asheville, with a senior US official telling the FT the impasse “came down to a few words.” It turns out one word did most of the damage.

According to Bloomberg - operating out of Hong Kong because they were banned from the event by Treasury – the decisive sticking point was the term “non-market” in a sentence on trade imbalances. Chinese officials read it as a coded attack on state-owned enterprises that sit at the foundation of the country’s economic model – and refused to sign.

Whether intended as a jab or not, Washington’s official definition of non-market policies and practices includes government interventions that shift global trade towards domestic industries, and it explicitly notes the conduct of state-owned or state-controlled firms. The phrase has anchored US complaints about China for years; the USTR framed its 2017 probe as a response to Beijing’s non-market economic system. Dropping it into a G20 text is a way of naming China without naming China.

The US didn’t budge after Beijing tried to soften it. The Chinese delegation – led by PBOC Governor Pan Gongsheng and Vice Finance Minister Liao Min, a veteran of last year’s tariff-war negotiations – floated alternative wording that would address imbalances without spotlighting SOEs, and reportedly picked up quiet backing from several other delegations. Yet the final US chair statement kept the line urging countries to “eliminate non-market policies and practices that exacerbate imbalances.”

In total, Treasury said China was pissed over four paragraphs - with “Non-market” appearing in two of them. The others spotlighted the functioning of key value chains, critical minerals and debt restructuring among them. That squares with what US and European officials told the FT: Beijing wouldn’t accept any reference to critical minerals at all.

Balance Deez Nuts

China’s Finance Ministry sidestepped Bessent’s remarks and called for a comprehensive, balanced view of global imbalances. Commerce Ministry spokesperson Huang Ling went further at Thursday’s briefing, saying that hyping imbalance and overcapacity claims at venues like the G20 is really about justifying protectionism and containing China. Pan, in a Wednesday statement, blamed rising protectionism, overstretched national-security framing and policy unpredictability for worsening imbalances – and offered a symmetrical remedy: deficit countries should narrow fiscal gaps and raise savings, while surplus countries boost consumption and investment.

In short: the $1.2 trillion surplus is your problem, not ours. For reference, China’s 2025 surplus was up 20% year-over-year, and the US deficit with China alone ran to roughly $200 billion, per BEA data.

Bessent kept swinging at a Charlotte Economics Club event on Wednesday, claiming that around 4% of Chinese GDP goes into industrial subsidies - pointing to BYD as a prime beneficiary: “It is the best $70,000 car that $35,000 can buy.”

Earlier this year, a Rhodium Group report put Chinese governments grants to BYD at roughly $292 per vehicle – about 5% of the company’s $4,700 cost advantage over Tesla in China – with most of the gap attributed to in-house component production and sheer scale. Beijing’s Commerce Ministry, in a July white paper disputing the overcapacity narrative, noted that the US and EU subsidize EVs and AI themselves and dismissed the non-market charge as a double standard.

What’s Next

Trump and Xi sit down in Washington on Sept. 24. Bessent runs the trade file and is set to lead bilateral AI talks in the coming weeks. Lawmakers are pressing Treasury to go after major Chinese banks over Iran. And the two sides just spent days in North Carolina unable to agree on a single adjective.

As one US official put it after Asheville: if they can’t agree on words, they won’t deliver on action. The more Washington organizes its China policy around the word “non-market,” the more Beijing reaches for another ace: critical minerals. Our decoupling theme stands.