The Watcher…Hillary isn’t applicable to you or any human unless you too are into “pedophilia”, “Satanism” and “child sacrifices”. Your call.

Just a side note..both Bush and Clinton are Jewish aka AshkeNazi Jews aka Pharisees

Rosenberg changed to Rodham

Scherf changed to Bush

Gospel of John chapter 3
From the Ancient Aramaic Scriptures

Youkhanna

John 3

1. There was a man* from the Pharisees, his name was Nicodemus, leader of the Jews,
2. Who came to Eashoa in the night, and said to him, “Rabbi, I know that from Allaha you have been sent a teacher, for no one* can be found [who can] perform these signs that you are doing, unless Allaha is with him.”
3. Eashoa replied and said to him, “Amen, amen, I say to you, if the human being is not born from above*, they cannot see the Kingdom of Allaha.”
4. Nicodemus said to him, “How can an old man get born, how can he enter his mother’s womb a second time*, to become born [again?]
5. Eashoa replied and said to him, “Amen, amen, I am telling you, if the human being is not born from the waters and the Spirit, they cannot enter the Kingdom of Allaha.
6. “Whoever is born of the flesh, is of the flesh, and whoever is born of the Spirit, is of the Spirit.

http://www.v-a.com/bible/john_3_audio.html

“Nowhere on the horizon of the political spectrum is there a coherent voice who is willing to fully explain how the United States of America has been kidnapped and mutilated by a demented foreign power motivated only by its own narcissistic psychoses.”

Sure there are voices that out there that speak truth to power. But they will never be allowed into a Dem ver Repub debate, and they will be ridiculed by the MSM.

Sean, I appreciate your scholarship and historical observations. Indicting whole races/religions, however, is a mass distraction from solid efforts to prosecute the alleged perpetrators of the American demise since the JFK coupe de tat (sp?). We prosecute based upon evidence of culpability in criminal activity, not the proffered religion of the accused. Know them by their deeds.

To your more addressable point of lacking leadership that can count to three. One plane, plus one plane, does not equal three buildings. Until we have leadership that will understand the basic situation – that we have suffered a usurped control of US government – we have nothing.

To that end, I ask this: Would you accept a complete outsider as an independent candidate?

Assuming such person demonstrated impeccable debating skills, had a written pre-knowledge of current events, was a great communicator, had a fully conceived plan of renewal starting with END the FED and yet had no recognizable experience in national politics – would you support such a candidacy?

Further, assume that such person was completely unsullied by paid influences, has little experience with lying, cheating and stealing, had many ideas about how to achieve American renewal, was a certified Patriot writer, but was a quarter ashkenazi (if not the grandson of a Rothschild bastard) – could you get behind such a person? Would you so much as “follow” on Facebook?

Add in this: author of the Free State Agenda http://www.dgvor.com/free-state-agenda.html, looks like a Kennedy, a life-long egalitarian, actual horse whisperer, master carpenter, been homeless, broke, wealthy and travelled the world with a backpack, an Ascentionist-Christian – would you support such a person?

How about if this person understood they were a “placeholder” for a better qualified candidate? What if they ran for vice-president with the mandate of finding America’s best person for American President over the next two years.

“Let the ideals of the aware and awake people of America rest on an independent candidate placeholder, and let us find the right person for the White House. Let our numbers be counted, let America know that we fight the good fight, let us make ourselves known and that freedom shall reign,” such a person would say.

I ask you: would you “like” such a person? Would you, reader, even dare to “like” this comment?