Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Deborah Dupre (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

DNC Lawsuit Whistleblowers Get Armed Bodyguards

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

By Deborah Dupré

Before It’s News Exclusive

Whistleblowers exposing Hillary Clinton’s DNC election fraud, likely to be or to become targeted individuals, will have armed guards, according to statements Tuesday by an attorney representing the plaintiffs. Oathkeepers offered to protect witnesses. Some witnesses are experiencing “bizarre” assaults by stalkers threatening them. In light of this plus three highly suspicious deaths linked to the case, the government’s targeted killing of Americans policy, and the Bush/Obama/Trump regime’s disregard for protecting whistleblowers, the need and acceptance of Oathkeeper’s offer are understandable.

Jared Beck, the attorney representing the plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the DNC and former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz for election fraud said that due to the death of three kee people in the case, other whistleblowers coming forward as witnesses are to be protected  by armed body guards.

“We have concluded it is time to bring these concerns to the court’s attention,” the plaintiff’s attorney Jared Beck said Tuesday in a press conference.

“As such, we filed a motion today to Judge Williams Lott to issue an order providing protection of the plaintiffs and their families as well as all potential witnesses in the DNC election fraud lawsuit.”

Seth Rich Bombshell. Secret Election Fraud Video Emerges

Seth Rich, Shawn Lucas and Beranten Whisenhart Jr were each directly linked to the DNC election fraud case. Each met untimely deaths within a month last year. director of new voter data, Rich was murdered after confronting the DNC about it rejecting certain voter ballots. Lucas had served the lawsuit against Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Reputable Federal prosecutor Beranten Whisenhart Jr, 37, died with possible head trauma caused by a gun shot or other means. He was working on both DNC election fraud and visa/passport fraud was found dead in the early morning. His body washed ashore a Hollywood, Florida beach in Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ district

“[R]ecent bizarre and disturbing conduct including threats against plaintiffs, their counsel and employees,” also prompted the filing of the motion for security, according to Beck.

The suspicious deaths and now threats led to the acceptance of protection by armed Oathkeepers, offered by the group and their president Stewart Rhodes, according to Beck in the filed motion.


Trump formerly made statements about protection needed by whistleblowers. By March, however, he called leakers criminals. In many instances, whistleblowers are supposed to be entitled protected by a law passed by Barack Obama. That, however, was all but negated when Obama signed his infamous targeted executive order.

In November of 2012, Barack Obama signed the “Whistleblower Enhancement Protection Act,” giving government employees reporting “a violation of any law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement; a gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety” additional protection from being fired, demoted, or reassigned for making these problems public.

That carries little weight against Obama’s “targeted killing” policy nor Trump’s change of tune regarding whistleblowers, as Sleuth Journal reported on Before It’s News:

“‘I love WikiLeaks,’ candidate Donald Trump said on October 10th on the campaign trail. He praised the organization for reporting on the darker side of the Hillary Clinton campaign. It was information likely leaked by a whistleblower from within the Clinton campaign to WikiLeaks.

“… The candidate praised whistleblowers and WikiLeaks often on the campaign trail. In fact, candidate Trump loved Wikileaks so much he mentioned the organization more than 140 times in the final month of the campaign alone! Now, as President, it seems Trump wants Wikileaks founder Julian Assange sent to prison.

“Last week CNN reported, citing anonymous ‘intelligence community’ sources, that the Trump Administration’s Justice Department was seeking the arrest of Assange and had found a way to charge the Wikileaks founder for publishing classified information without charging other media outlets such as the New York Times and Washington Post for publishing the same information.”

Just this week, Trump’s team charged whistleblower Reality Winner with espionage and is holding her in jail without any contacts. Trump allegedly urged Comey to imprison journalists who publish classified information, a “grave threat to press freedom,” says Freedom of the Press Foundation

Oathkeeprs are a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, police, and first responders, who pledge to fulfill the oath all military and police take to “defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” according to the organization’s website. It encourages members – including current and former U.S. military and law enforcement officers – not to obey orders that violate the United States Constitution. The organization says it has a membership of up to 30,000.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) lists Oathkeepers founder Stewart Rhodes as a known extremist and says his plans to create localized militia units are “frightening”. According to the SPLC, Oathkeeprs espouse a number of conspiracy and legal theories associated with the sovereign citizen movement and white supremacist posse comitatus movement. (Lenz, Ryan (July 25, 2013). “Oath Keepers Rally Reveals Radical Politics of Group”. Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 20 March 2016.)

SPLC senior fellow Mark Potok describes the group as a whole as “really just an anti-government group who believe in a wild set of conspiracy theories.” (Oath Keepers: What anti-hate groups are saying about them”. Cox Media Group. August 11, 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2017)

SPLC are viewed by many progressives,however, as slanderers and smear artists.  Rather than applaud upholding the Constitution, SPLC calls them a dangerous right wing militia, and finds persons with criminal records calling themselves an Oathkeeper, and then smears the whole group with guilt by association.  

“Understandably, the establishment left like Hillary Clinton would not want soldiers to start questioning orders were she to start rounding up her political enemies,” one progressive wrote in an email this week,

Proof in the pudding about Oathkeepers will be if and when it offers protection for whistleblowers testifying in the election rigging nobody is talking about, the one Republican lawmakers are involved.  The election of 2016 might have been stolen — or as Donald Trump often said — “rigged,” yet few in media have been willing to discuss the whole picture. To do so would open Pandora’s box even wider than Beck and DNC plaintiffs are doing, because it involves even more lawmakers, ones presently overlooked in the election fraud hoopla against democrats.

“[In] fact: in 27 Republican-controlled states (including critical swing states) hundreds of thousands (possibly millions) of people showed up to vote, but were mysteriously blocked from voting for allegedly being registered with the intent to vote in multiple states.” (Salon)

There were over 200 million rejected voters due to “Crosscheck” in 27 states, as award-winning investigative reporter Greg Palast exposes in his most recent movie, Best Democracy Money Can Buy.

When government denies its citizens their inalienable rights guaranteed in the Constitution, the citizenry has the right to  respond accordingly, as also granted by the Constitution. Oathkeepers have vowed to do just that for whistleblowers involved in the lawsuit against Democrats.

Otherwise, well, we all know the usual fate of such whistleblowers of high-level corruption. 

Related Articles by Deborah Dupré

Seth Rich Bombshell. Secret Election Fraud Video Emerges

Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)

Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!

Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 4 comments
    • Deborah Dupre

      When government denies people their inalienable rights guaranteed in the Constitution, the people need to respond according to such rights violations as also granted by the Constitution. Oathkeepers have vowed to do just that.

    • Paul Brown

      Chilling. The Oathkeepers seem to have shown some very poor judgment like bringing weapons to peaceful demonstrations, the so=called “wild conspiracy theories” pertain to some very real events like the caging of Katrina victims who otherwise could have walked or been bussed away from the hell of the Superdome catastrophe but were blocked by government officers. FEMA hed them prisoners, depriving them of food, water and safety. Their oath is to stand down when told to perform unconstitutional acts, not to take up arms against anyone.
      It is ironic, though, that they will be using arms to protect plaintiffs and witnesses. Now they should do the same for a lawsuit against the GOP officials responsible for voter suppression. But I haven’t heard of such a lawsuit. Is there one?

      • Deborah Dupre

        If you had a chance to watch Greg Palast’s investigation highlights in his amazing documentary, you see that media and others have ****repeatedly dismissed his evidence**** of Republican election fraud using “Crosscheck” to eliminate poor and people of color votes and instead, gone hog wild over the DNC fraud. (Historically, media supports the status quo – by definition, the left conservative policy/narrative…)

        The DNC filed a lawsuit against the Republican National Committee in October alleging the GOP was violating a 34-year-old court order that bars the RNC from using “voter fraud” as an excuse to suppress votes.

        The RNC has been under federal monitoring since it sent a “Ballot Security Task Force” to minority neighborhoods in 1981 – but we rarely hear about that.

        The consent decree dates back to 1982, in the aftermath of the 1981 election in New Jersey. Facing a close governor’s race, the RNC and New Jersey Republican Party recruited volunteers (including off-duty law enforcement officers) to serve on a “National Ballot Security Task Force.”

        The task force — wearing armbands and some with holstered guns — patrolled outside several polling places (all in predominantly black and Latino neighborhoods) on Election Day. Now – both parties simply tap Crosscheck. Millions of votes were tossed out – but this we know – practically all were poor and/or people of color – a perfect way to usher fascism – be it by Trump or Hillary.

        In short, the reality is that both parties are crooked and use similar voter fraud tactics so that no election is a real representation of the peoples’ votes – and then you throw in super delegates controlled by special interest groups – rich business people – so the whole thing is a sham. We ALL – left and right have to be big enough to admit this before we can see any real progress. Otherwise, more Clinton body bags and more NWO elitists controlling Americans.

    • Josie

      I love you guys, you are probably our last stand. The only thing is when the shadow government brings in the U.N.’s blue helment bastards don’t know if you could hold them off. Their needs to be a lot of prayers. God Bless you Men and Women who still belive in and are willing to protect our Constitution!

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.