By Deborah Dupré

Before It’s News Exclusive

Whistleblowers exposing Hillary Clinton’s DNC election fraud, likely to be or to become targeted individuals, will have armed guards, according to statements Tuesday by an attorney representing the plaintiffs. Oathkeepers offered to protect witnesses. Some witnesses are experiencing “bizarre” assaults by stalkers threatening them. In light of this plus three highly suspicious deaths linked to the case, the government’s targeted killing of Americans policy, and the Bush/Obama/Trump regime’s disregard for protecting whistleblowers, the need and acceptance of Oathkeeper’s offer are understandable.

Jared Beck, the attorney representing the plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the DNC and former DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz for election fraud said that due to the death of three kee people in the case, other whistleblowers coming forward as witnesses are to be protected  by armed body guards.

“We have concluded it is time to bring these concerns to the court’s attention,” the plaintiff’s attorney Jared Beck said Tuesday in a press conference.

“As such, we filed a motion today to Judge Williams Lott to issue an order providing protection of the plaintiffs and their families as well as all potential witnesses in the DNC election fraud lawsuit.”

Seth Rich Bombshell. Secret Election Fraud Video Emerges

Seth Rich, Shawn Lucas and Beranten Whisenhart Jr were each directly linked to the DNC election fraud case. Each met untimely deaths within a month last year. director of new voter data, Rich was murdered after confronting the DNC about it rejecting certain voter ballots. Lucas had served the lawsuit against Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Reputable Federal prosecutor Beranten Whisenhart Jr, 37, died with possible head trauma caused by a gun shot or other means. He was working on both DNC election fraud and visa/passport fraud was found dead in the early morning. His body washed ashore a Hollywood, Florida beach in Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ district

“[R]ecent bizarre and disturbing conduct including threats against plaintiffs, their counsel and employees,” also prompted the filing of the motion for security, according to Beck.

The suspicious deaths and now threats led to the acceptance of protection by armed Oathkeepers, offered by the group and their president Stewart Rhodes, according to Beck in the filed motion.

OATHKEEPERS NEEDED

Trump formerly made statements about protection needed by whistleblowers. By March, however, he called leakers criminals. In many instances, whistleblowers are supposed to be entitled protected by a law passed by Barack Obama. That, however, was all but negated when Obama signed his infamous targeted executive order.

In November of 2012, Barack Obama signed the “Whistleblower Enhancement Protection Act,” giving government employees reporting “a violation of any law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement; a gross waste of funds; an abuse of authority; or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety” additional protection from being fired, demoted, or reassigned for making these problems public.

That carries little weight against Obama’s “targeted killing” policy nor Trump’s change of tune regarding whistleblowers, as Sleuth Journal reported on Before It’s News:

“‘I love WikiLeaks,’ candidate Donald Trump said on October 10th on the campaign trail. He praised the organization for reporting on the darker side of the Hillary Clinton campaign. It was information likely leaked by a whistleblower from within the Clinton campaign to WikiLeaks.

“… The candidate praised whistleblowers and WikiLeaks often on the campaign trail. In fact, candidate Trump loved Wikileaks so much he mentioned the organization more than 140 times in the final month of the campaign alone! Now, as President, it seems Trump wants Wikileaks founder Julian Assange sent to prison.

“Last week CNN reported, citing anonymous ‘intelligence community’ sources, that the Trump Administration’s Justice Department was seeking the arrest of Assange and had found a way to charge the Wikileaks founder for publishing classified information without charging other media outlets such as the New York Times and Washington Post for publishing the same information.”

Just this week, Trump’s team charged whistleblower Reality Winner with espionage and is holding her in jail without any contacts. Trump allegedly urged Comey to imprison journalists who publish classified information, a “grave threat to press freedom,” says Freedom of the Press Foundation. 

Oathkeeprs are a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, police, and first responders, who pledge to fulfill the oath all military and police take to “defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” according to the organization’s website. It encourages members – including current and former U.S. military and law enforcement officers – not to obey orders that violate the United States Constitution. The organization says it has a membership of up to 30,000.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) lists Oathkeepers founder Stewart Rhodes as a known extremist and says his plans to create localized militia units are “frightening”. According to the SPLC, Oathkeeprs espouse a number of conspiracy and legal theories associated with the sovereign citizen movement and white supremacist posse comitatus movement. (Lenz, Ryan (July 25, 2013). “Oath Keepers Rally Reveals Radical Politics of Group”. Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 20 March 2016.)

SPLC senior fellow Mark Potok describes the group as a whole as “really just an anti-government group who believe in a wild set of conspiracy theories.” (Oath Keepers: What anti-hate groups are saying about them”. Cox Media Group. August 11, 2015. Retrieved 14 June 2017)

SPLC are viewed by many progressives,however, as slanderers and smear artists.  Rather than applaud upholding the Constitution, SPLC calls them a dangerous right wing militia, and finds persons with criminal records calling themselves an Oathkeeper, and then smears the whole group with guilt by association.  

Proof in the pudding about Oathkeepers will be if and when it offers protection for whistleblowers testifying in the election rigging nobody is talking about, the one Republican lawmakers are involved.  The election of 2016 might have been stolen — or as Donald Trump often said — “rigged,” yet few in media have been willing to discuss the whole picture. To do so would open Pandora’s box even wider than Beck and DNC plaintiffs are doing, because it involves even more lawmakers, ones presently overlooked in the election fraud hoopla against democrats.

“[In] fact: in 27 Republican-controlled states (including critical swing states) hundreds of thousands (possibly millions) of people showed up to vote, but were mysteriously blocked from voting for allegedly being registered with the intent to vote in multiple states.” (Salon)

There were over 200 million rejected voters due to “Crosscheck” in 27 states, as award-winning investigative reporter Greg Palast exposes in his most recent movie, Best Democracy Money Can Buy.

When government denies its citizens their inalienable rights guaranteed in the Constitution, the citizenry has the right to  respond accordingly, as also granted by the Constitution. Oathkeepers have vowed to do just that for whistleblowers involved in the lawsuit against Democrats.

Otherwise, well, we all know the usual fate of such whistleblowers of high-level corruption. 

Related Articles by Deborah Dupré

Seth Rich Bombshell. Secret Election Fraud Video Emerges