Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Setting Brushfires / Tim Brown
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

The 2020 Election Bamboozle: We Are All Victims of the Deep State’s Con Game

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


“We’re run by the Pentagon, we’re run by Madison Avenue, we’re run by television, and as long as we accept those things and don’t revolt we’ll have to go along with the stream to the eventual avalanche…. As long as we go out and buy stuff, we’re at their mercy… We all live in a little Village. Your Village may be different from other people’s Villages, but we are all prisoners.”— Patrick McGoohan

This is not an election.

This is a con game, a scam, a grift, a hustle, a bunko, a swindle, a flimflam, a gaffle, and a bamboozle.

In this carefully choreographed scheme to strip the American citizenry of our power and our rights, “we the people” are nothing more than marks, suckers, stooges, mugs, rubes, or gulls.

We are victims of the Deep State’s confidence game.

Every confidence game has six essential stages: 1) the foundation to lay the groundwork for the illusion; 2) the approach whereby the victim is contacted; 3) the build-up to make the victim feel like they’ve got a vested interest in the outcome; 4) the corroboration (aided by third-party conspirators) to legitimize that the scammers are, in fact, on the up-and-up; 5) the pay-off, in which the victim gets to experience some small early “wins”; and 6) the “hurrah”— a sudden manufactured crisis or change of events that creates a sense of urgency.

In this particular con game, every candidate dangled before us as some form of political savior—including Donald Trump and Joe Biden—is part of a long-running, elaborate scam intended to persuade us that, despite all appearances to the contrary, we live in a constitutional republic.

In this way, the voters are the dupes, the candidates are the shills, and as usual, it’s the Deep State rigging the outcome.

Terrorist attacks, pandemics, civil unrest: these are all manipulated crises that add to the sense of urgency and help us feel invested in the outcome of the various elections, but it doesn’t change much in the long term.

No matter who wins this election, we’ll all still be prisoners of the Deep State.

We just haven’t learned to recognize our prison walls as such.

It’s like that old British television series The Prisonerwhich takes place in a mysterious, self-contained, cosmopolitan, seemingly idyllic retirement community known only as The Village.

Perhaps the best visual debate ever on individuality and freedom, The Prisoner (17 episodes in all) centers around a British secret agent who abruptly resigns only to find himself imprisoned, monitored by militarized drones, and interrogated in The Village, a beautiful resort with parks and green fields, recreational activities and even a butler.

While luxurious, the Village is a virtual prison disguised as a seaside paradise: its inhabitants have no true freedom, they cannot leave the Village, they are under constant surveillance, all of their movements tracked. Residents of the Village are stripped of their individuality and identified only by numbers.

First broadcast in Great Britain 50-some years ago, The Prisoner dystopian television series —described as “James Bond meets George Orwell filtered through Franz Kafka”—confronted societal themes that are still relevant today: the rise of a police state, the loss of freedom, round-the-clock surveillance, the corruption of government, totalitarianism, weaponization, group think, mass marketing, and the tendency of human beings to meekly accept their lot in life as prisoners in a prison of their own making.

The series’ protagonist, played by Patrick McGoohan is Number Six.

Number Two, the Village administrator, acts as an agent for the unseen and all-powerful Number One, whose identity is not revealed until the final episode.

“I am not a number. I am a free man,” was the mantra chanted on each episode of The Prisoner, which was largely written and directed by Patrick McGoohan, who also played the title role.

In the opening episode (“The Arrival”), Number Six meets Number Two, who explains to him that he is in The Village because information stored “inside” his head has made him too valuable to be allowed to roam free “outside.”

Throughout the series, Number Six is subjected to interrogation tactics, torture, hallucinogenic drugs, identity theft, mind control, dream manipulation, and various forms of social indoctrination and physical coercion in order to “persuade” him to comply, give up, give in and subjugate himself to the will of the powers-that-be.

Number Six refuses to comply.

In every episode, Number Six resists the Village’s indoctrination methods, struggles to maintain his own identity, and attempts to escape his captors. “I will not make any deals with you,” he pointedly remarks to Number Two. “I’ve resigned. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.”

Yet no matter how far Number Six manages to get in his efforts to escape, it’s never far enough.

Watched by surveillance cameras and other devices, Number Six’s attempts to escape are continuously thwarted by ominous white balloon-like spheres known as “rovers.” Still, he refuses to give up. “Unlike me,” he says to his fellow prisoners, “many of you have accepted the situation of your imprisonment, and will die here like rotten cabbages.”

Number Six’s escapes become a surreal exercise in futility, each episode an unfunny, unsettling Groundhog’s Day that builds to the same frustrating denouement: there is no escape.

As journalist Scott Thill concludes for Wired, “Rebellion always comes at a price. During the acclaimed run of The Prisoner, Number Six is tortured, battered and even body-snatched: In the episode ‘Do Not Forsake Me Oh My Darling,’ his mind is transplanted to another man’s body. Number Six repeatedly escapes The Village only to be returned to it in the end, trapped like an animal, overcome by a restless energy he cannot expend, and betrayed by nearly everyone around him.”

The series is a chilling lesson about how difficult it is to gain one’s freedom in a society in which prison walls are disguised within the seemingly benevolent trappings of technological and scientific progress, national security and the need to guard against terrorists, pandemics, civil unrest, etc.

As Thill noted, “The Prisoner was an allegory of the individual, aiming to find peace and freedom in a dystopia masquerading as a utopia.”

The Prisoner’s Village is also an apt allegory for the American Police State: it gives the illusion of freedom while functioning all the while like a prison: controlled, watchful, inflexible, punitive, deadly and inescapable.

The American Police State, much like The Prisoner’s Village, is a metaphorical panopticon, a circular prison in which the inmates are monitored by a single watchman situated in a central tower. Because the inmates cannot see the watchman, they are unable to tell whether or not they are being watched at any given time and must proceed under the assumption that they are always being watched.

Eighteenth century social theorist Jeremy Bentham envisioned the panopticon prison to be a cheaper and more effective means of “obtaining power of mind over mind, in a quantity hitherto without example.”

Bentham’s panopticon, in which the prisoners are used as a source of cheap, menial labor, has become a model for the modern surveillance state in which the populace is constantly being watched, controlled and managed by the powers-that-be while funding its existence.

Nowhere to run and nowhere to hide: this is the new mantra of the architects of the Deep State and their corporate collaborators (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google, Instagram, etc.).

Government eyes are watching you.

They see your every move: what you read, how much you spend, where you go, with whom you interact, when you wake up in the morning, what you’re watching on television and reading on the internet.

Every move you make is being monitored, mined for data, crunched, and tabulated in order to amass a profile of who you are, what makes you tick, and how best to control you when and if it becomes necessary to bring you in line.

When the government sees all and knows all and has an abundance of laws to render even the most seemingly upstanding citizen a criminal and lawbreaker, then the old adage that you’ve got nothing to worry about if you’ve got nothing to hide no longer applies.

Apart from the obvious dangers posed by a government that feels justified and empowered to spy on its people and use its ever-expanding arsenal of weapons and technology to monitor and control them, we’re approaching a time in which we will be forced to choose between obeying the dictates of the government—i.e., the law, or whatever a government official deems the law to be—and maintaining our individuality, integrity and independence.

When people talk about privacy, they mistakenly assume it protects only that which is hidden behind a wall or under one’s clothing. The courts have fostered this misunderstanding with their constantly shifting delineation of what constitutes an “expectation of privacy.” And technology has furthered muddied the waters.

However, privacy is so much more than what you do or say behind locked doors. It is a way of living one’s life firm in the belief that you are the master of your life, and barring any immediate danger to another person (which is far different from the carefully crafted threats to national security the government uses to justify its actions), it’s no one’s business what you read, what you say, where you go, whom you spend your time with, and how you spend your money.

Unfortunately, George Orwell’s 1984—where “you had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized”—has now become our reality.

We now find ourselves in the unenviable position of being monitored, managed, corralled and controlled by technologies that answer to government and corporate rulers.

Consider that on any given day, the average American going about his daily business will be monitored, surveilled, spied on and tracked in more than 20 different ways, by both government and corporate eyes and ears.

A byproduct of this new age in which we live, whether you’re walking through a store, driving your car, checking email, or talking to friends and family on the phone, you can be sure that some government agency, whether the NSA or some other entity, is listening in and tracking your behavior.

This doesn’t even begin to touch on the corporate trackers that monitor your purchases, web browsing, Facebook posts and other activities taking place in the cyber sphere.

Stingray devices mounted on police cars to warrantlessly track cell phones, Doppler radar devices that can detect human breathing and movement within in a home, license plate readers that can record up to 1800 license plates per minutesidewalk and “public space” cameras coupled with facial recognition and behavior-sensing technology that lay the groundwork for police “pre-crime” programspolice body cameras that turn police officers into roving surveillance cameras, the internet of things: all of these technologies (and more) add up to a society in which there’s little room for indiscretions, imperfections, or acts of independence—especially not when the government can listen in on your phone calls, read your emails, monitor your driving habits, track your movements, scrutinize your purchases and peer through the walls of your home.

As French philosopher Michel Foucault concluded in his 1975 book Discipline and Punish, “Visibility is a trap.”

This is the electronic concentration camp—the panopticon prison—the Village—in which we are now caged.

It is a prison from which there will be no escape. Certainly not if the government and its corporate allies have anything to say about it.

As Glenn Greenwald notes:

“The way things are supposed to work is that we’re supposed to know virtually everything about what [government officials] do: that’s why they’re called public servants. They’re supposed to know virtually nothing about what we do: that’s why we’re called private individuals. This dynamic – the hallmark of a healthy and free society – has been radically reversed. Now, they know everything about what we do, and are constantly building systems to know more. Meanwhile, we know less and less about what they do, as they build walls of secrecy behind which they function. That’s the imbalance that needs to come to an end. No democracy can be healthy and functional if the most consequential acts of those who wield political power are completely unknown to those to whom they are supposed to be accountable.”

None of this will change, no matter who wins this upcoming presidential election.

And that’s the hustle, you see: because despite all of the work being done to help us buy into the fantasy that things will change if we just elect the right candidate, the day after a new president is sworn in, we’ll still find ourselves prisoners of the Village.

This should come as no surprise to those who haven’t been taking the escapist blue pill, who haven’t fallen for the Deep State’s phony rhetoric, who haven’t been lured in by the promise of a political savior: we never stopped being prisoners.

So how do you escape? For starters, resist the urge to conform to a group mind and the tyranny of mob-think as controlled by the Deep State.

Think for yourself. Be an individual. As McGoohan commented in 1968, “At this moment individuals are being drained of their personalities and being brainwashed into slaves… As long as people feel something, that’s the great thing. It’s when they are walking around not thinking and not feeling, that’s tough. When you get a mob like that, you can turn them into the sort of gang that Hitler had.”

You want to be free? Remove the blindfold that blinds you to the Deep State’s con game, stop doping yourself with government propaganda, and break free of the political chokehold that has got you marching in lockstep with tyrants and dictators.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, until you come to terms with the fact that the government is the problem (no matter which party dominates), you’ll never be free.

Article posted with permission from John Whitehead



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Immusist Beverage Concentrate - Proprietary blend, formulated to reduce inflammation while hydrating and oxygenating the cells.

Report abuse
Loading...
Loading...

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 6 comments
  • beLIEve

    THERE IS NO “US Government”………..ju$t IMPER$ONATOR$. :idea:

    * * *

    FALSELY IMPERSONATING A FEDERAL OFFICER: What Is the PENALTY :?:

    FALSELY IMPERSONATING A federal officer or EMPLOYEE OF the UNITED STATES :idea: IS A FEDERAL CRIME punishable by a fine or UP TO THREE YEARS OF IMPRISONMENT.
    ANYONE WHO PRETENDS TO BE someone ACTING UNDER the AUTHORITY OF any department or agency of THE UNITED STATES, AND acts as such, or demands or OBTAINS ANY MONEY…DOCUMENT….OR….THING of VALUE…. BY ACTING as such….IS GUILTY OF….. ….FALSE PERSONATION…… :idea: :idea:

    Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 912 provides:
    Whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and ACTS as such, or IN SUCH PRETENDED CHARACTER… demands or obtains any money, paper, document, or thing of value, SHALL BE FINED UNDER THIS TITLE or IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN THREE YEARS, or both.

    Thus, there are TWO POSSIBLE OFFENSES under § 912: (1) PRETENDING TO BE a federal agent AND ACTING as SUCH;
    and (2) PRETENDING TO BE a federal agent…AND DEMANDIG or OBTAINING CERTAIN LISTED ITEMS.
    This article addresses the elements of THE FIRST OFFENSE —falsely pretending to be a federal agent and acting as such.

    WHAT IS REQUIRED to FALSELY IMPERSONATE a Federal Officer :?:
    The first clause of § 912 includes TWO distinct ELEMENTS: (1) a FALSE PRETENSE…

    • beLIEve

      ……CONTINUED from my incomplete post above…….

      The first clause of § 912 includes TWO distinct ELEMENTS: (1) a FALSE PRETENSE asserting federal authority; and (2) AN OVERT PHYSICAL ACT taken IN the CAPACITY OF the PRETENDED AUTHORITY. :idea:

      However, the statute does not specify the overt acts that satisfy the first provision. Instead, § 912 serves as a catch-all provision for acts not necessarily covered by more SPECIFIC IMPERSONATION CRIMES, such as 18 U.S.C.A. § 702 (unauthorized wearing of uniform) or 18 U.S.C.A. § 913 (MAKING ARREST… or SEARCH WHILE IMPERSONATING FEDERAL OFFICER, AGENT, or EMPLOYEE). Thus courts have applied a broad interpretation of the provision in qualifying acts that violate the statute.

      FALSE PRETENSE :idea:

      TO BE GUILTY of FALSELY IMPERSONATING a FEDERAL OFFICER, the offender must knowingly undertake a false identity or persona of a federal official. THE PRETENDED CHARACTER…MUST ASSERT or APPEAR TO ACT……….UNDER the AUTHORITY OF the UNITED STATES….SUCH THAT the false pretense causes the PERSON DECEIVED to RELY ON the ASSERTED AUTHORITY. :idea:

      The pretended identity does not have to be one from an existing federal department or agency. For example, PRETENDING TO BE a federal bookseller of presidential documents—AN OFFICE THAT DOES NOT OFFICIALLY EXIST —has been held to satisfy the statute.
      HAVING ASSUMED a ….FALSE FEDERAL IDENTITY……the OFFENDER MU$T THEN AL$O UNDERTAKE AN OVERT ACT…

      • beLIEve

        …..CONTINUED from my incomplete post above…….

        HAVING ASSUMED a ….FALSE FEDERAL IDENTITY……the OFFENDER MU$T THEN AL$O UNDERTAKE AN OVERT ACT UNDER the AUTHORITY OF the the FALSE PERSONA.

        In this way, THE STATUTE REQUIRES BOTH…..A STATE OF MIND OF ADOPTING A FALSE PRETENSE……AND…..AN OVERT ACT CONSISTENT WITH the ASSUMED IDENTITY.

        OVERT ACT

        Likewise, the overt act that is performed does not have to be an act that a genuine federal official is authorized to perform in his or her official capacity, as long as THE ACT IS PERFORMED UNDER….the FALSE PRETENSE OF the AUTHORITY OF the UNITED STATES. :idea:
        For example, pretending to be a United States Senator and directing a prison warden to stay the execution of a state prisoner has been held to satisfy the statute, even though a Senator has no authority to stay an execution of death.

        At least one court has espoused the view that the offender does not have to actually assert any authority of the pretended office to “act as such” under the statute.
        Rather, the OFFENDER MAY SIMPLY…ACT IN KEEPING…WITH the FALSE PERSONA. :idea:

        For EXAMPLE :idea: :lol:
        ……A DEFENDENT…..PRETENDING TO BE AN INTERNAL REVENUE AGENT……WHO MERELY STATED THAT HE WAS SEEKING the CURRENT ADDRESS OF A PARTICULAR PERSON……..WAS HELD TO VIOLATE the STATUTE…….EVEN THOUGH……HE ASSERTED NO AUTHORITY AS AN….IRS AGENT. :idea: :idea: :idea:

        Likewise, an offender was held…

        • beLIEve

          CONTINUED from my incomplete post above…….

          ……HE ASSERTED NO AUTHORITY AS AN….IRS AGENT. :idea: :idea: :idea:

          Likewise, an offender was held to have committed an overt act sufficient for a conviction SIMPLY BY WEARING A GUN IN A HOLSTER WHILE PRETENDING TO BE an FBI AGENT. Although simply boasting of being a federal official with “mere bravado” is not acting “under the authority” of the federal persona, the court held that because the owner of the home in which the offender was lodging would have been frightened and intolerant of a gun being worn in the home had she not understood the offender to be an FBI agent, the court held that the offender’s wearing of the gun was more than idle boasting of the persona. Rather, it was an overt act that caused the owner to tolerate a gun in the home when she would not have done so otherwise.

          DEMANDING or OBTAINING SPECIFIC ITEMS :idea:
          The second clause of the provision sets out A SEPARATE OFFENSE…..of ACTING AS A FEDERAL AUTHORITY ….AND…..DEMANDING or OBTAINING….CERTAIN DOCUMENTS…PAPERS…or….ANYTHING OF VALUE. :idea:

          In charging the offenses, the overt act required under the first offense may not be the same act of demanding or obtaining items sufficient to charge the second offense. Such charges are held to be duplicitous and cannot be used to charge two separate offenses. Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that where a defendant is charged with…

          • beLIEve

            CONTINUED from my incomplete post above…….

            ……Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that where a defendant is charged with two or more offenses, the offenses must be set forth in separate counts. Therefore, where A DEFENDANT, PRETENDING TO BE AN OFFICER OF the UNITED STATES Engineer Office of the WAR DEPARTMENT, PLACED A TELEPHONE CALL TO A NAMED INDIVIDUAL and DEMANDED REGISTRATION CARDS….. the act of MAKING the TELEPHONE CALL was held to be an overt act SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN A CONVICTION under the first offense within the provision.
            However, the TELEPHONE CALL ALSO WAS the BASIS FOR CONVICTION …… under the subsequent clause…..PROHIBITING the DEMANDING or OBTAINING OF DOCUMENTS BY such PRETENSE.
            Under such circumstances, conviction under both clauses of the statute would be duplicitous.

            Provided by HG.org

            https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/falsely-impersonating-a-federal-officer-what-is-the-penalty-53754

            * $$ * $$ * $$ *

            Does the FEDERAL RESERVE own or hold gold?

            The Federal Reserve does not own gold.

            The GOLD RESERVE ACT of 1934 :!: required the Federal Reserve System to transfer ownership of all of its gold to the DEPARTMENT OF….THE TREASURY. :idea: (beLIEve comment……THERE IS NO…”US GOVERNMENT” DEPARTMENT…..of “The Treasury” :!: ) :idea:

            In exchange, the SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY :idea: …….(beLIEve comment…….THERE IS NO “US GOVERNMENT” ……..”Secretary of…

          • beLIEve

            ……CONTINUED from my incomplete post above…….

            …..In exchange, the SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY :idea: …….(beLIEve comment….THERE IS NO “US GOVERNMENT” ……..”Secretary of the Treasury” :!: ) :idea:

            SECRETARY OF…THE TREASURY…….. issued gold certificates to the Federal Reserve for the amount of gold transferred at the then-applicable statutory price for gold held by the Treasury.

            :arrow: CLICK on LINK below for full article

            https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/does-the-federal-reserve-own-or-hold-gold.htm

            * $$ * $$ * $$ *

            beLIEve comment…….

            ALSE PRETENSE
            In a SUPREME COURT CASE, effected in the past few years….IT BECAME APPARENT THAT……..the so-called…….”Secretery of The US Treasury” was/is, in fact……a PRIVATE SECTOR buSINessman….and…….The “US Treasury”…IS……a PRIVATE SECTOR buSINess :!: :idea:

            *****
            ANOTHER….IMPERSONATION……..
            ………www.federalreserve.gov :lol: ………FEDERAL RESERVE IS NOT “government”……IT IS PRIVATE. :idea:

MOST RECENT
Load more ...

SignUp

Login

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.