Proving the Charlie Kirk Assassination was an Info Op

Reposted from https://johncleer.substack.com/p/proving-the-charlie-kirk-assassination

The memorial is over and we’ve had a week to watch the replays and observe the strange developments which seem to be neverending in this case. The most obvious of them is that there was no autopsy. That should tell you something: If there were a high profile death, there’d at least be a fake autopsy.

Before the dispatch leaked, Utah’s Public Safety Commissioner said the body was moved to the State Medical Examiner’s Office, presumably to do the autopsy there, which would perhaps be standard practice. What’s NOT standard practice is signing the death certificate, with cause of death and so on all filled out, BEFORE the autopsy. The death certificate was signed at the hospital and there’s not going to be any autopsy after that. That’s what it means when they sign it.

The newest explanation (first ten minutes), via Marcus Allen and Gary Melton, is the FBI did the autopsy in their forensics lab. I think it’s cut-and-dry that murder is a state crime and the state, not FBI, has jurisdiction. But if the FBI took control of the autopsy, why would they send the body to the State Medical Examiner? Why would he go to either, with the cause of death already solved and signed on the death certificate?

Now how about this ridiculous story that the bullet, which landed in Kirk’s upper neck, somehow turned down into his chest and, just to let us know how stupid they think we are, fragmented and bounced back up. Alternately, and equally hard to believe, a TPUSA spokesman claims a surgeon found the bullet under the skin.

But Alex Jones’ new theory (that the bullet bounced down inside Kirk’s neck) has since redirected to Jones’ previous theory that it glanced off a bulletproof vest, which Kirk’s wife says he didn’t wear. Is Jones writing the FBI reports? Now they’re looking at it in the FBI forensics lab, the story goes, and when they’re done they’ll detail the cause of death, weeks after the death certificate was signed.

Obviously, they’re saying this because everyone saw there was no exit wound, and everyone knows a bullet from that Mauser would blow right through the neck and the tent and splatter flesh everywhere. They’re changing the story as they go. But the neck wound can’t be an entry and it can’t be an exit, either. It’s way too small to be a neck exit. It’s possible a frangible round could hit the front of the neck, leave a wider-than-normal entry hole and stop without going through; but there’s no reason a sniper would use those, and there’s no way an amateur shooter did this by himself.

You can ascertain it was no lone amateur by how strange everything is, if you didn’t know the government falsely makes that claim every assassination. Whatever this is, the other people are involved: the crew hauling Kirk to the van, the policemen who didn’t secure the crime scene, the security who didn’t block access to that roof, the FBI who forged text messages between the shooter persona and his transgender lover. All of a sudden the shooters are all transgender now, when they used to be white Republicans and everyone knew it was fake (it still is). It’s funny though, the new shooters, just like the old, have relatives in intelligence and law enforcement.

I will prove here that what we saw, whatever its purpose, was effectively a movie shoot. No adult would watch Spartacus (1960) and go home thinking Kirk Douglas was dead. But we thought Charlie was because we bring different expectations to politics than to the movies, and because we’ve been groomed to assume newsmen are who we’re told they are, rather than actors playing roles for the Agency or even living their role as an assumed identity. Further, this was not only a real world event, it was on a college campus, which we’ve been groomed to associate with mass shootings.

Kirk’s apparent death was hard for me to watch because I thought it was real, too. Like the rest of us I didn’t know him, but when his interviews came on it felt like I did. It ate at me all evening and then I saw the shot and a montage of him with his family at the beach and I cried. The jolt of his body convinced me in an instant it wasn’t another fake school shooting, and it felt like I watched a friend die. In the family video, his children looked just like mine. What would they do without their dad? What would my children do if that happened to me?

Some experts had the opposite reaction, namely that he should’ve been kicked from his chair, but I’m a layman, the target demographic, and I thought they shot him.

Later in the night, I watched a closeup of the impact and it had the opposite effect on me. On that second viewing, I noticed Kirk’s massive bleed was dark, not arterial. Immediately I confirmed with Brave AI what I knew to be true, that arterial blood is always bright red (unless it’s in the pulmonary arteries, which are not in the neck), and that only arterial blood can spurt out like that, because arteries, unlike veins, are highly pressurized. When you see the blood spray out away from the body, as Kirk’s appeared to to me and others, that’s an arterial bleed. This would mean the bleed was too dark to be arterial and too strong to be from the jugular, and could not be real.

On further review, I found out I was wrong: jugular blood could spurt away from the body to the degree Kirk’s did, being from such a large vein, or at any rate, I couldn’t say with any conviction that it didn’t. It sputtered somewhat and was unsteady, but it also fell mostly downward.

The problem is it stopped bleeding, and jugular wounds don’t do that. Charlie lost what looked like a pint of blood in seconds and then it was like someone turned off the water. You can’t see this in the tapes, because the cameras all conveniently panned away at the last split-second, but you’ll see here there was no blood anywhere near the tent afterward, and he didn’t bleed as they hauled him to the van. There wasn’t a drop anywhere or on anyone.

And that’s impossible. You can’t lose venal blood from an artery, and you can’t drop a pint in seconds from the jugular then stop bleeding on a dime. In theory that could happen with arterial bleeds, but the color’s a dead giveaway it wasn’t arterial. That blood can only have come from the jugular, and once it starts there’s no stopping it.

The bleed was artificial.

What the eye can see is the onset of blood coming only half a second after the shot, and that it spewed profusely from the very start. This sudden onset would not normally happen from a jugular wound; instead, the body would temporarily shunt the bloodflow into the smaller surrounding veins, which would quickly fail and after they did, there’d be a marked increase in the bleed rate. But that’s not what happened.

It poured out right away, in Hollywood fashion at full speed, and then it stopped; and right before it stopped, all the cameras simultaneously started filming somewhere else. This one on the right (fake gore warning) swung away from Kirk with great vigor, as did this one, to the left and above, where the cameraman somehow knew to zoom in immediately before the shot. In this one from the front lower left, he shakes the camera rapidly from left to right and back until it “lands” filming someone’s back. What are the odds of all three cameras losing their target at the same time?

After they pretended to rush Kirk out for medical attention, someone removed the memory card containing the footage from the tent’s rear camera, and someone tampered with the front camera, probably taking that film too. Candace Owens claims she saw the rear footage and it shows what we know it has to, no blood. But the front one is more interesting because it filmed Charlie’s neck from close range, on the side of the wound.

Accompanying that tape’s disappearance (the most important film of the shooting), the tape of the guy they call the shooter appears to be selectively curated. Did he run onto the roof out of a portal? There’s really no footage of where he shot from?

On J13 in Butler, this cameraman near the podium on Trump’s right panned away to make a face right before the shots, and missed them completely; also mirroring the Kirk event, TMZ’s film of the man on the roof blurs out of focus just as the first shot rings and pans away to film the trees before the second and third. There’s no film of the shooter firing, just as in Utah.

There’s a grab from TMZ’s zoomed-in video of “Crooks” on the roof where you can faintly see a tiny fuzzy shape in the air near Crooks’ rifle with the first shot’s audio, which has been shilled aggressively on X as the casing being ejected. It’s a few pixels wide, it only shows in three frames and it contrasts with Crooks’ shoulder appearing not to move in the slightest in the actual film. But in the “proof,” whether intentional or not, the edit zooms in as the footage rolls, giving the false appearance of movement.

More importantly, you’ll notice if you look closely that the casing appears on the film before the shot rings out. This is decidedly NOT evidence of him firing, but to the contrary, shows the government engaged in another fabrication. It’s shocking, I know, that the USG would do this. But there’s no way TMZ gets that footage without a government middleman, and editing a few pixels into three frames of film would be child’s play for them.

In Trump’s case, the evidence bears out that he was NOT shot in the ear: compare his own statements about it, at the RNC for example, with the photos and stills of his hand and his reticence to talk about it, and the total absence of any hard evidence despite being surrounded by cameras, and you’ll see the shot ear was a psyop that Trump reluctantly went along with. As with the Kirk autopsy, medical reports on the ear weren’t released and probably were never done, since there was no actual wound.

Whether there was a real attempt or not is anyone’s guess. The audio showed bullets traveling to and past the podium, and seems to corroborate one round stopping in Corey Comperatore’s area. But there was no shot in the ear and the famed bullet that exploded on the rail with the first shot (that they also say hit Trump’s ear) appears to have been a frangible bullet, which are designed to do that so no one is hurt by the ricochet. Again, a sniper would not use those, but the government would if they were doing a stunt and didn’t want people in the stands to get hit.

Real attempt or not, we can infer from the panic of the cameramen and the official narrative that the fake bloody ear and Crooks’ firing were key components of the op: hence the need for the close range camera pointed directly at Trump’s right ear to pan away, and for the one trained on Crooks to blur his body, then pan away, as the shots were fired and Trump grabbed his ear, so we wouldn’t see that Crooks didn’t move and Trump wasn’t hit.

 

The Signalmen

If you went to that magic show where they put a woman in the chest and saw her in half then put the boxes back together, and you didn’t already know about the trick, it would blow your mind. And if they did the sawing and you ran out before they put her back together, you probably wouldn’t believe me if I told you later she wasn’t sawed.

Many think there was a shot from the rear and Orem was an inside job, based largely on the hand signals from Charlie’s team and the assumption he was actually shot. They think Kirk’s team killed him. There’s another side who also find it self-evident that Kirk was shot, but say those guys couldn’t have done it because they were his friends, and that those are not in fact hand signals.

Clearly these are faulty models, but in this case it’s correct that Kirk’s friends did no such thing. Let’s briefly review what happened and why these theories are wrong, and then we’ll theorize on how they pulled the rabbit out of the hat (Charlie’s shirt).

Behind Kirk leading up to the shot, two men make a deliberate series of hand and arm gestures. Jeffrey Prather, former DIA Chief of Global Operations, confirms here those are common sniper signals. Black Shirt watches White Shirt touch his hat and face, then Black Shirt taps Charlie Kirk, crosses his arms, looks out and taps his own chest with his left hand, and the shot is fired. It sends ripples across Kirk’s chest before he snaps left. George Papadopoulos has a breakdown on his X of what the signals mean I found convincing.

Further from the tent, @Salomondrin on X got a tip about a man in a white shirt at the fence he’s sure used a cell phone gun. He believes the motion of man’s hands as he held his phone is him taking shots. He then plays a clip taken from Kirk’s right, in which Kirk appears to fall “back and to the left” along that man’s line of sight, with the exit wound fitting close to that trajectory.

There’s also a theory that a window flash in a building lines up with a flash on White Hat’s phone. On the phone the flash was a military-grade laser that confirmed the shot was lined up, and the window light was the muzzle flash right after. Something like that. And there are others.

Obviously, if it were true there wouldn’t be fake blood coming out of Kirk’s neck. But I’m outlining the possibilities as desired outcomes in the targets’ perceptions (ours) and from them, we will build a hypothesis of the psyop.

This clip and commentary, from an unknown account, makes the case that the nearby man in the green long sleeves took the shot. In it you can see what looks like a gun, or some other device, in his hand being lowered to his side after impact. I think it’s a remote control for the blood squib under Kirk’s shirt, that was widely mistaken for a bulletproof vest since its movement at the time of what we thought was the shot gave the appearance it was hit by the shot. But the fake blood could have been detonated from anywhere.

 

Charlie’s Magic Hat

Charlie’s fake blood only ran a few seconds because it was pumped from a bag and there wasn’t any left. The bag was under his shirt and the blood was expelled from it with a squib, what Hollywood uses for fake gunshot wounds since 1945. You can see the impression of the hose under his shirt on the film, in the frontal view because the chest definition is still visible underneath (it’s not a bulletproof vest), and from the side when he adjusts it. If that’s a microphone then perhaps it’s there to give a plausible denial for the hose’s plainly visible silhouette; it could also be a clip or magnet to hold the hose in place. But there wouldn’t be a line that thick and rigid to the mic.

Squib Pictures and Video— 

[Did not embed properly]

          See them and the rest of the article at:

          https://johncleer.substack.com/p/proving-the-charlie-kirk-assassination

 

***************************************************************

“Proving the Charlie Kirk Assassination was an Info Op” © 2025 by John Cleer is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International