obama birth certificate: the antibirthers and the obots.

I just lifted this from the internet site Obama conspiracy theory (“doc” kevin davidson)’s site. he is one of the leading voices in the obot world. pro Obama people interested in defending further scrutiny, flock to gather at this site.

here’s what one poster wrote:

Colin Foote August 19, 2013 at 4:01 am (Quote) # 

I am one of those people inclined to never engage the nonsense of a unaccountable blog with comment because it is beneath the dignity of intellectual discourse to do so. But, in this one, rare case, after reading your post I was prompted to respond when confronted with the blatant failure on your part to acknowledge some important “therefores”.

In your lazy explanation of Reggie Love’s account of Obama’s birth certificate (and your misquote of the interview between Love and the interviewer), and subsequently, the .pdf image of an alleged official vital record, you guess, (in promotion of a conspiracy between Obama, his lawyers and the state of Hawaii, I might add) that several individuals convened into a “chain of custody” schema designed to preemptively address, which did not exist at that time, that Obama’s birth certificate might be called a forgery someday. Your delusions, while simultaneously presenting arguments against conspiracy theories which do not favor Obama, promote equally stupid conspiracies conjured to make excuses in favor of Obama. You can see that your theory looks somewhat paranoid, right?

Here’s just one example. While you choose to swallow whole everything you have been told about the birth certificate by Obama and those who adore him, you make an astonishing leap into the following conjecture: 

For the sake of argument, let us agree that Obama, himself, did, in fact, provide a self-written request to the HDOH for an official copy of his original birth certificate, (a document which, despite birth to parents who resided in Hawaii in 1965, looks nothing like mine). And, as a result of that request, let’s agree that someone working for the HDOH perused through the archives, located Obama’s document bound within a book of thousands of other birth certificates, took that entire book to a copier, (the left margin of the image implies this is what was done to produce Obama’s doc), then placed it upon a carefully spliced piece of safety paper cut precisely to fit the page and reveal the left binding through a ‘window’ cut in the safety paper, but obscure the state seal, secretary of state signature and natal statistics at the bottom, even while integrating flawlessly and seamlessly with the hatch pattern of the body of the image along the top, right and bottom. 

Then, they took two paper copies and stamped them with Alvin’s grammatically obscure, smiley face signature stamp in the bottom margin, placed the copies in an envelope(s) we should have confidence was sealed and handed off to someone claiming to be acting on behalf of Obama. (or did the HDOH turn the copies into .pdf images at the vital statistics office?) Your “chain of custody” conspiracy theory gets complicated at this point.

Here’s where your “chain of custody” conspiracy begins to fall apart. When the reps returned with alleged certified copies of Obama’s original birth certificate, did they give them to someone other than Obama? Who else must we now infer was a part of your “chain of custody” conspiracy theory? Certainly, you don’t believe Obama received them himself and posted them to WH.gov, right? Chain of custody is important to know in this case, right? Or, did the lawyers produce the .pdf images themselves, then post one of them to the WH.gov site? Who did they hand them off to? What was the name of the person who took those copies and turned them into a .pdf image? Who then posted the .pdf image? Chain of custody, right? 

You give reasonable account up until the plane lands in Washington D.C. some time after April 25, but then, you just become a bungling idiot lacking the capability to go to the next logical level of inquisition. You appear afraid to ask the hard questions about Obama’s birth certificate image. All of which you claim to be feasible is derived from what you have been told happened by Obama and his horde of degenerate media dregs. Decent, reasonable people of faith know this. 

You never provide credible evidence or attachment to any explanatory merit about how, or who, a .pdf image of an alleged official vital record found its way onto a government controlled, tax funded media source as the sole piece of information about the identity of the individual claiming to be president. You tote the chain of custody conspiracy as long as that chain of custody supports your narrow motives, but when hard truths become inconvenient and psychologically painful, you abandon it.

Who all was involved in the chain of custody and what did they do with this document image leading up to its presentation to the American people? Simple question to ask. 

Not once have you ever been able to reconcile this void of truth with fact, or theory, in the reasonable mind.

Given your indentured reputation as a refuter of conspiracies against Obama, you look more and more like a conspiracist FOR Obama than ever. Perhaps the truth will someday render hypocrites of us all, but until that day of judgment comes, the least you could do is give the appearance that you are not one already. 

If you are not a bald face liar, you are, quite simply, the most willingly ignorant tool for flourishing deception I have ever come upon on the internet. Truly pathetic.

******************************

this is elegantly written, and puts to words extremely well, the sentiment of many of we the birthers. I don’t know this guy (girl ?), and certainly could not call this person a birther. 

but one thing I have noticed is the quality and increased frequency of new posters everywhere across the web. they are beginning to take a closer look at this ongoing situation. these are sagacious newcomers to the Obama provenance arena. every day more new people arrive on the scene, the obots can’t stop it, and it scares the hell out of them.

what makes this interesting to me, falls squarely into the pattern of behavior around the events of the bizarre releasing of the second (long form) birth certificate, including the most recent affirmation by body guy reggie love (is that name right out of central casting or what?), that the certificate was indeed lost, but was now found. (this actually ties together with Obama’s own autobiography written by bill ayers, where he kept the original cert in a book obama carried around, which may be where love got the notion). ayers, incidentally and coincidentally, is a self proclaimed domestic terrorist, and master forger. the ayers residence (bernardine dorhn), as you will recall, is where the obamas launched their political career in Chicago.

the antibirthers, though they will never admit to being organized, work as an internet “flock of hawks” responding to any doubts, ordinary people may have about the Obama’s. now… if they were the other team (our team) they would scream “why can’t we question authority !”. that is one element that has always seemed odd to me, that they would abandon that basic philosophical political tenet. they have become the very thing they have railed against.

the obots goal is not to facilitate the events and provenance surrounding this epic controversial caper. though it has taken a long time for information to come out, the obots defend, while at the same time pretend, there is no controversy. there has never been a controversy, or even a question, about the former senator’s past. we all know better by now.

I predict this poster will be banned very quickly, because he (like me) has gone straight into the hornet’s nest, without intrepid concern. 

watch the obots, how they operate, to me they have always been in the center ring of this Obama fiasco, I truly believe they will, albeit inadvertently, help lead us to the truth. they have certainly been instrumental in keeping this story alive, so more average folks can get involved, learn the story, and help America solve this seemingly endless smelly political affair.

the antibirthers say now since Obama has been elected twice “what difference does it make, at this point !?”. to which I say, I think that phrase has already been trademarked/earmarked for the Hillary Clinton/Debbie Wasserman run, as their 2016 campaign slogan.

what is pathetic mostly about doc’s site, is that they portend interest in objective opinion, but their real operation is to chew up seemingly nice people who don’t fall in line with the party. all you have to do is read the comments, to see them belittling then chasing people away, after using them as a subliminal punching bag. pathetic indeed, is what they have become.