Judicial Watch Sues Justice Dept. for Records of Meetings Between Jack Smith Team and Federal Judges

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for records concerning meetings between former Special Counsel Jack Smith and members of his team and two Obama-appointed federal judges who presided over matters involving President Donald Trump (Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:26-cv-02027)).

Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit after the Justice Department failed to respond to a March 24, 2026, FOIA request submitted to the Office of Information Policy (OIP) for all records concerning meetings between Special Counsel Jack Smith and/or members of his team and Chief Judge Beryl Howell or Judge James Boasberg from December 2022 through April 2023, including notes, recordings, transcripts, calendar entries, agendas, presentations, and other related documents.

On November 18, 2022, three days after Trump announced he would run for president again in 2024, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith to investigate potential criminal wrongdoing by Trump. The appointment came nine days after then-President Joe Biden announced his effort to make sure Trump did not become president again.

In March 2026, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) released briefing notes prepared for Attorney General Merrick Garland from January 2023 that refer to interactions between Smith’s team and Judges Howell and Boasberg. The notes describe a meeting with Howell in which Smith’s team discussed the pace of the investigation over the preceding month and state that Howell “liked our approach of pursuing the executive privilege litigation in an omnibus fashion.” The briefing notes also state that, regarding a planned omnibus executive privilege motion involving former Trump administration officials, “Chief Judge knows it is coming and loves idea.”

The notes also reference “Judge Boasberg = March 18.” Boasberg became chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 17, 2023, succeeding Howell and assuming responsibility for supervising grand jury matters before the court.

“There are important questions about communications between Jack Smith’s team and the federal judges involved in President Trump’s cases,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The American people deserve full transparency regarding these meetings and any discussions.”

Before his appointment to investigate and prosecute Trump, Smith previously was at the center of several other controversial issues, the IRS scandal among them.

Judicial Watch is a national leader in exposing the lawfare and abuse targeting Trump and other American citizens.

In April 2026, Judicial Watch sued the Justice Department for records on the Biden FBI’s search warrants used in the April 2021 raid on former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s residence and office (Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:26-cv-01158)). Giuliani served as a personal attorney and informal adviser to President Donald Trump. 

 In May 2026, Judicial Watch obtained records that revealed the FBI’s concerns about the legal basis for the 2022 raid of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home. The records exposed explicit objections from field agents who warned the Justice Department that the unprecedented raid on Trump’s home lacked probable cause.

In March 2026, the Justice Department reported that the FBI found about 1.9 million pages of records that are responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit. These documents were reportedly stored in a “hidden room” at FBI headquarters and were first revealed by former Deputy Director Dan Bongino (Judicial Watch v U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:25-cv-04047)).

In March 2026, Judicial Watch sued the Justice Department for records from the FBI’s Biden-era “Arctic Frost” probe, specifically involving the Criminal Division, the Office of Information Policy, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco and Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:26-cv-00746)).

In March 2026, Judicial Watch asked a Georgia state court to reject Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ efforts to continue hiding records about her office’s communications with Jack Smith’s office and the January 6 Committee (Judicial Watch Inc. v. Fani Willis et al. (No. 24-CV-002805)).

In February 2026, Judicial Watch secured the release of rosters identifying the names of top deputies who worked for former Special Counsel Jack Smith (Judicial Watch Inc. v U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:23-cv-01485)).

In January 2026, Judicial Watch sued the Justice Department for communications of FBI agents regarding the prosecution of former Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro (Judicial Watch Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No.1:26-cv-00079)).

In January 2025, a federal court ordered the Justice Department to provide Judicial Watch information on communications between Jack Smith and Fani Willis regarding the prosecution of Trump. In May 2025, the Justice Department was directed to search text messages from the Special Counsel’s Office for responsive records (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 23-cv-03110).

 ###

The post Judicial Watch Sues Justice Dept. for Records of Meetings Between Jack Smith Team and Federal Judges appeared first on Judicial Watch.

Source: https://www.judicialwatch.org/meetings-jack-smith-team-federal-judges/