Gerrymandering battles: the Colorado front

A guest editorial by M.A. Rothman, with comments from TPOL

Mr. Rothman published this on Monday, 29 June: (our comments in italics)

ð‚ðŽð‹ðŽð‘ð€ðƒðŽ ð’ð”ðð‘ð„ðŒð„ ð‚ðŽð”ð‘ð“ ðð‹ðŽð‚ðŠð’ ðƒð„ðŒðŽð‚ð‘ð€ð“ ðð‹ð€ð ð“ðŽ ð’ð“ð„ð€ð‹ ð“ð‡ð‘ð„ð„ ð‚ðŽðð†ð‘ð„ð’ð’ðˆðŽðð€ð‹ ð’ð„ð€ð“ð’ — ðƒð„ð‹ð„ð†ð€ð“ðˆðŽð ð’ð“ð€ð˜ð’ ðŸ’ð‘-ðŸ’ðƒ

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled today that Democrats cannot use ballot initiatives to gerrymander the state’s congressional map and deliver themselves a permanent supermajority. The ruling is a clean win for election integrity.

At best, it is a clean win for procedure and practice, and leaves the question open in the longer term. This is something that Colorado and other “Blue States” have done and faced in the past. We predict that they will in the future. We note that the 4R-4D headline is very optimistic: Colorado is as rife with election fraud (and punishing those who seek to fight against it) as any other State. And the very recent SCOTUS Nazgul decision ensures Colorado continues to enjoy a license to do so: several of those GOP seats are far from safe!

Three ballot initiatives — numbered 240, 241, and 242, backed by a group called “Coloradans for a Level Playing Field” — would have redrawn Colorado’s congressional map to give Democrats seven of the state’s eight seats in Congress. The current delegation sits at 4R-4D. The plan was to flip three Republican seats for 2028 and 2030, ð¥ð¨ðœð¤ð¢ð§ð  ð¢ð§ ðš ð©ðžð«ð¦ðšð§ðžð§ð­ ðƒðžð¦ð¨ðœð«ðšð­ð¢ðœ ðšðð¯ðšð§ð­ðšð ðž through rigged redistricting.

This is the latest act in the continuing drama of Gerrymandering across the nation, as the two old parties continue to see who can pretend to dominate Congress and many states, to get a tiny bit more of the loot stolen by governments into their pockets, those of their supporters, and those of their families. But again, especially given the fragmented nature of the Colorado GOP, lovers of liberty are better off in 150-year-old Colorado with some balance in the publicly-pushed conflict. For one thing, we’ve seen how the domination of Colorado in the General Assembly and the Executive and Judicial branches has damaged the Centennial State. As has happened in California, New York, Massachusetts and elsewhere.

But there is a problem.

The court found that the initiatives violated Colorado’s constitution by bundling multiple changes into a single ballot measure — violating the single-subject requirement. Justice Richard Gabriel wrote that allowing “interlocking measures like those at issue here would allow proponents to achieve indirectly what they could not achieve directly” — an ðžð§ð ð«ð®ð§ ðšð«ð¨ð®ð§ð ð­ð¡ðž ðœð¨ð§ð¬ð­ð¢ð­ð®ð­ð¢ð¨ð§. The court said no.

What too many reviewers and commentators have so far refused to talk about is this. This is a procedural victory against the Democratic coup. But it provides exactly what the Democrats (#1 Hater of Liberty in Colorado and all Fifty States) have been working on for decades. They will continue to corrupt the electorate of Colorado, and they will continue to push for more and more insane policies and actions. They know that the public – including voters – will see compromise as a good thing. So it is only a matter of time – probably only a few years, before the next effort to make Colorado permanently blue is launched. With better chances of winning. As Mr. Roth points out in the next paragraph.

This is the Democrat playbook when they can’t win outright: rewrite the rules, rig the maps, and push through structural changes designed to make their electoral advantages permanent. In Colorado — a state they’ve already been winning — that wasn’t enough. They needed to lock it in forever. The delegation stays 4R-4D, and ð­ð¡ð«ðžðž ð¦ðšð§ð®ðŸðšðœð­ð®ð«ðžð ð¬ðžðšð­ð¬ ð°ðžð«ðž ð¬ð­ð¨ð©ð©ðžð before they could be installed.

Of course, he does not point out that that the GOP will do exactly the same thing. They use the same playbook. Indeed, it was the efforts in Texas and Florida that seem to have prompted this matter in California, Colorado, and elsewhere. Does it matter if our prison uniform stipes run horizontally (GOP) or vertically (Democratic)?

ð“ð¡ðž ðœð¨ð®ð«ð­ ð¡ðšð§ððžð ð­ð¡ðž ððžðœð¢ð¬ð¢ð¨ð§ ð›ðšðœð¤ ð­ð¨ ð­ð¡ðž ð¯ð¨ð­ðžð«ð¬ — ðžð±ðšðœð­ð¥ð² ð°ð¡ðžð«ðž ð¢ð­ ð›ðžð¥ð¨ð§ð ð¬.

Unfortunately, that is the refrain of those who believe in democracy, and not in the idea of limited (and as little as possible if not none) government. Where voters do not see themselves as vicars of the Almighty, and elections (for people and issues) are decided by one more vote of a normally small minority of residents and even voters than the other side gets. Colorado’s General Assembly resembles the corrupt House of Commons in Great Britain more and more. And we point out, has far more power than the Commons had in the time of George III or even Victoria. And it is that power than is to be feared, more than which old party will wield it.

READ MORE

Source: https://freedombunker.com/2026/07/05/gerrymandering-battles-the-colorado-front/