I have this interview coming up soon , i will let you know when it's done, thank you so much for everything that you do for us all ,Garry Marino

Common Core In recent years, the federal government has succeeded in expanding their control over health care, financial markets, the auto industry, the coal industry, and more. Now they have gained greater control over our nation’s public school systems with a program that one Georgia lawmaker calls “No Child Left Behind on steroids.”

The federal government is in the process of fundamentally transforming America’s historically decentralized public school system into a nationalized system. They call it the Common Core Curriculum and it is sweeping across the country with a vengeance. 45 states have already fallen into line, accepting federal government grant money in exchange for adopting what amounts to a new national curriculum for math and language arts. But a few states have refused the offer, including Texas, Alaska, Virginia, Minnesota, and Nebraska. Now Georgia is considering reversing its position by rejecting it too.

To help put this into perspective, American school systems operated just fine without any national oversight for about 200 years, until 1980. Before that, there was no federal agency to oversee state and local school districts. All that changed when the Department of Education was signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 17, 1979. Today this agency has a massive annual budget of over $50 billion.

But not to worry. As President Obama likes to say, the government does not spend money, it “invests.”

So what has America gotten from this “investment?” Based on standardized test scores, the Department of Education has been a dismal failure. Test scores have been declining steadily for decades. In 2012, reading scores on the SAT hit a 40 year low. According to the College Board, over half the students, 57%, did not score well enough to indicate likely success in college. So it looks like the Department of Education has been another losing investment from our federal government. What a shocker!

But while the Department of Education has delivered dismal test scores, they have succeeded in two things… expanding their own power and spending more taxpayer money. That seems to be the only things they are consistently good at doing. They accomplished that using the same bag of tricks that has worked so well for them in their dealings with state and local governments on other issues. They spend a large part of their $50 billion annual budget to entice states to adopt their programs. In the private sector this is called bribery. For the federal government it is called standard procedure.

Isn’t it interesting that American citizens get jail time for offering cash payments to elected officials in exchange for changed behavior, but for the federal government this is just standard procedure in their dealings with state and local governments? Hmm…

For example, the Department of Education’s latest greatest grant money offer to state governments is called the Race to the Top. The primary performance requirement to get these funds is adoption of the Common Core State Standards. The Race to the Top program is attempting to drive school districts across the country into what amounts to a national “one-size-fits-all” curriculum for math and language arts.

The Common Core Standards Curriculum offers unproven educational benefits. Some educators believe it will even have a negative impact. The educational benefits will not be known for several more years, but by that time states will be stuck in a program they can no longer change. States that accepted the grant money gave up control over their school curriculum. They are now unable to change any of the curriculum standards and are only allowed to make minor changes to course content, not to exceed 15% of the total content. The remaining 85% is now under federal government control.

On the surface, the offer looks like easy money for states, but there are strings attached and significant hidden costs. For example, states are required to adopt new testing procedures, which significantly raises the testing cost per student. The grant money expires after four years, leaving the states stuck paying the higher costs.

Beyond that, the costs of implementing the Common Core Curriculum Standards are enormous. In Texas, the federal government offered $700 million in grant money over four years. But the Texas Education Commissioner, Robert Scott, analyzed the program and determined the total cost of scrapping their curriculum standards and implementing the Common Core would cost Texas between $2.5 and $3.0 billion. After sharing his findings with Texas Governor Rick Perry, the Governor turned down the grant money. Texas schools will maintain their freedom from the mandates of the grant.

Now other states are taking notes from the Texas cost analysis. Georgia state legislator William Ligon invited Commissioner Scott to come to Georgia to share his findings with Georgia lawmakers. So last week, Commissioner Scott came to Georgia and presented his findings to a standing-room only audience at the state Capitol. After their meeting, Congressman Ligon released a newsletter, which provided the following summary of Scott’s visit:

During Scott’s visit at the Capitol, he explained that the Common Core State Standards were developed behind closed doors and that they are owned and copyrighted by unaccountable third parties in Washington, D.C. These standards were never vetted by the people of Georgia in an open, accountable process, and the terms of the grant forbid the State from changing the standards or even adding content that exceeds the threshold of 15 percent.

Commissioner Scott explained how Texas analyzed the Common Core Standards and determined it was a bad financial deal in spite of the “bribe” money.

Scott explained that the State of Texas was wooed by the federal government with a promise of $700 million to sign onto Race to the Top and Common Core. However, after his calculations, he realized that scrapping his State’s current standards and implementing the terms of the grant would cost between $2.5 to $3 billion. In his eyes, it was a sorry trade to shackle Texas to federal mandates, rob Texas citizens of their right to control educational standards, and then stick taxpayers with a bill of at least $2 billion to make up the difference. To add insult to injury, that amount did not include the ongoing maintenance of the system for the years ahead beyond the four years of the grant.

That analysis includes the costs for the whole package, which includes all strings attached. Congressman Ligon explained this finding:

Further, the accompanying tests, developed by the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, known as the PARCC national testing consortium, will create such testing demands that this will probably become better known as No Child Left Behind on steroids. Scott informed us that the PARCC will cost approximately $30 to $37 per student, in comparison to Georgia’s current costs of between $5 to $10 per student. These estimates do not take into account the additional technology, both in hardware and bandwidth, that will be required at the local level for online testing.

So Texas rejected their offer for $700 million in federal funds and now it appears Georgia might be rejecting their offer for $400 million. Georgia lawmakers are now planning to do their own cost analysis of the Race to the Top program. The results of that analysis will determine whether Georgia stays in the program or gets out.

Isn’t it interesting that despite having an annual deficit exceeding one trillion dollars our federal government is still throwing billions of dollars at states? They act like they can’t find anywhere to cut spending, yet here is an example of where they are spending billions to implement an unproven, unpopular national curriculum that has very questionable educational benefits and adds significant higher costs for taxpayers. Spending $700 million here and $400 million there, pretty soon you are talking about a lot of money.

For the federal government, the Common Core Standards have already been a big success because it has helped them to expand their own power, which is ultimately what this is all about. Decades of declining test scores prove educating our kids is not the primary objective. At least there are still a few states holding out, so the federal government expansion is hitting a few speed bumps. Hopefully more states will follow Texas’ lead by completing a thorough cost analysis. If states that accepted the grant money realize it was a bad deal perhaps they will reverse their position and reject the Common Core Curriculum.

We need to inform and educate as many people as possible about Common Core Standards. Once educated, people need to ban together and put pressure on their State Legislatures to stop Common Core Standards. If parents had any idea what Common Core Standards are designed to do, they would be appalled. However, Common Core Standards were brought into the states by the Federal govt. very stealthily and most people have no idea what is going on. It is unconstitutional and it was buried in the Stimulus bill passed right after Obama was elected. Of course, no one read the bill.

In the Charleston, SC area, many 912 members and other Conservatives are forming a group to fight Common Core Standards in South Carolina. If you live in the area and are interested in joining the fight, please contact Bill Bates at [email protected] (there is an underscore between bill and bates). If you live someplace else, consider starting a group there and/or get your local 912′s and others to get involved. This is extremely important.

Cathy

‘I have wondered at times about what the Ten Commandments would
have looked like if Moses had run them through the U.S. Congress..
-Ronald Reagan

Common Core Standards’ Devastating Impact

Posted by Michael CHILDS, Admin II on April 4, 2013 at 5:00pm in Patriot Action Alerts

Common Core Standards’ Devastating Impact
Since taking office, the Obama Administration has been intent on controlling what is taught at every grade level in all of the nation’s schools. It has used its flagship “Race to the Top” competitive grant program to bring states together to adopt the K-12 standards developed by a joint project of the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). It has also suggested, in its 2009 Blueprint for Education Reform, that adoption of these common standards could one day be a qualification for states wanting future Title 1 dollars for low-income schools.

The Common Core State Standards provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them. The standards are designed to be robust and relevant to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in college and careers. With American students fully prepared for the future, our communities will be best positioned to compete successfully in the global economy.
http://www.corestandards.org/

Education ‘Reform’ 101: How The Common Core Relates To Other Big Ideas Sweeping Florida Schools

That’s a familiar refrain in K-12 education. And the latest big thing may be bigger than all the others: It’s the Common Core education standards that Florida and 45 other states are now putting in place. And it has public schools across the country sitting on the cusp of a massive change in nearly every aspect of how math and English are taught, learned and tested.
But how does this big thing relate to all the other big things in education that you’ve probably heard about? Here’s a StateImpact survival guide to recent education overhauls.
http://stateimpact.npr.org/florida/2013/04/04/education-reform-101-…

States Must Reject National Education Standards While There Is Still Time

The Obama Administration is intent on nationalizing the content taught in every public school across America. Without congressional approval, the Administration has used a combination of carrots and sticks to spur states to sign on to the Common Core State Standards Initiative. Common Core includes standards for English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics, and federally funded national assessments have been crafted to align with the standards.
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/04/states-must-reject…

“Economist Debates: State capitalism: Statements”
“This house believes that state capitalism is a viable alternative to liberal …. Mr Bremmer defines state capitalism as a system in which political elites control … capitalism are autocracies—most importantly China but also Russia” – http://www.economist.com/debate/days/view/802
“““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
Who’s Behind the Common Core Curriculum?

Like so many education reform initiatives that seem to arise out of nowhere, the Common Core State Standards is another of these sweeping phantom movements that have gotten their impetus from a cadre of invisible human beings endowed with inordinate power to impose their ideas on everybody.
For example, the idea of collecting intimate personal data on public school students and teachers seems to have arisen spontaneously in the bowels of the National Center for Education Statistics in Washington. It required a small army of education psychologists to put together the data handbooks, which are periodically expanded to include more personal information.
Nobody knows who exactly authorized the creation of such a dossier on every student and teacher in American public schools, but the program exists and is being paid for by the taxpayer. And strange as it may seem, it arose seemingly out of nowhere, like a vampire, to suck the freedom out of the American people. Unlike Santa’s elves who work behind the scenes to bring happiness to children, these subterranean phantoms work overtime to find ways of making American children miserable.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/13412-whos-behin…

“““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
Catholic schools embrace Common Core

The Common Core isn’t just for public schools anymore.These days, private schools across the country are jumping on the public education standards bandwagon, in many cases restructuring their traditional curricula to meet the nearly national Common Core, the new set of educational standards and tests for public schools.
http://www.mansfieldnewsjournal.com/article/AB/20130330/NEWS0102/30…

Our churches should be fighting this with Church schools. But these churches in America dont want to lose that revenue from the coffers so they refuse to open a school. I personally know one church with probably 60 kids in it. Relatively average size church. A large portion of them are home schooled.
When asked why they dont open a school. The pastors first response was that they dont want to spend the money on that, plus they could lose church members if something happened within the school. Meaning they would lose money and that cant have that.
Only about 5% of our Baptist churches have schools, out of a few thousand nation wide.
If you want to change the hearts and minds of the kids, you better start getting your church to think about opening a school.
“““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
See who is behind Common Core…Eli Broad and Bill Gates are just the beginning. I have found equally disturbing information in the Delaware Common Core/CSCOPE curriculum…
http://www.examiner.com/article/making-common-sense-of-common-core
You cannot win this battle on the defensive. They have vision: Indoctrinate the children to a leftist, socialistic point of view. They will do, say, and sacrifice anything to make this happen.
The Conservative vision seems to be a live and let live ho hum sorta thing. React if things get bad enough but overall…do nothing.
In a fight, who would you put your money on?
Honestly, do Conservatives have a plan to take over education, the courts, the federal governement, and the media? Are they pumping billions into these endeavors?
No.
Thought the whole IDEA of home schooling was to remove the government from education of our kids. I said to hell with their curriculum teach the basic reading writing math and the Constitution advancing them through out their home school years and then let the child expand into areas that interest them science,physic,biology,mechanic,carpentry,art whatever. but leave the leftist playbook outside the homeschool

BREAKING: DHS Says They Can Seize Your Gold, Silver, And Guns If They Feel Like It

AUTHOR Bookworm

Last week, we learned that Cyprus, yet another bankrupt EU country, was going to try to replenish its wealth by confiscating money from all but smallest accounts held in its banks. Things were so bad that officials were warning depositors to “get your money out while you can.” In America, we looked on horrified, grateful that it can’t happen here. Except that maybe it can.

The Investment Watch blog is working to confirm reports that banks are circulating in-house memos telling employees that the DHS has announced that the Patriot Act gives it the right to seize, without a warrant, any and all customer bank accounts, to make “periodic and unannounced visits” to banks, and to open and inspect “select safe deposit boxes.”
These same memos also say that the DHS “shall, at the discretion of the agent supervising the search, remove, photograph or seize as evidence” such items as “bar gold, gold coins , firearms of any kind unless manufactured prior to 1878, documents such as passports or foreign bank account records, pornography or any material that, in the opinion of the agent, shall be deemed of to be of a contraband nature.”

The memo also warns bank employees to keep their mouths shut. They can lose their jobs and be prosecuted under the Patriot Act if they release “improper . . . classified DHS Security information” to the public, including customers whose safe deposit boxes the DHS has inspected. Bank employees are also barred from taking to the media or releasing information on the internet.

As noted, Investment Watch is in the process of confirming this report. It’s not hard, though, to believe that it’s true. To date, the DHS has given itself an open checkbook to buy billions of bullets and thousands of tanks and guns. Moreover, it has held itself out as being above the law, since it has refused to respond to Congressional requests from Rep. Leonard Lance (R-NJ) as well as from fifteen other Republican House members, demanding information about the DHS buying binge, including giving information about the urban warfare tanks that it is shipping all over the United States. Small wonder, then, that so many Americans view it with suspicion.
Could what happened in Cyprus happen here?

My Story Went To Montel TV Show…Until I Told The Judge On My Case To Look For It,, Oh Well.The Judge in my pre- determined divorce and custody case, Judge Joseph J. Farah was bias, and a part of the conspiracy
against me ,he repeatedly, ruled in line with the conspiracy ,i did not get due process there was libel publish ,perjury under oath, The Judge Farah, miss called, my default case on March 10 -03, all of my true copy court document’s that said anything good about me are missing, from court records submitted by my then Attoy. Kenneth C. Reeds,that’s obstucton of justice, their inability to keep there stories straight,by plaintiff Ex Richard A Battle Sr. and his Attoy. Damika Pace Byrd, the plaintiff’s scandal was covered up by Judge Joseph Farah, a deliberate defauding of the court,that went on for three years…I was facing 20 years to life over a lie that i was going to kill my children my Ex husband and others,they said it on a court made video, that i sent a Hitman out to get the job done,{libel publish} by [1],Judge Joseph Farah [2] , Richard Battle Sr., [3]Damika L. Pace Byrd,Plaintiff Attorney[ 4] Mary Furlett, Court Therapist, [5] Melinda Gather, Friend Of The Court, Worker {6] Dannett Coleman- Long, A School Staff Member,[7] William J. Hayes, My Attoy.[8] Carrie Byrd ,Judge Joseph J. Farah’s Court Clerk,[9] Elizabeth Clay, A School worker,I declare that the statements above are true, Brenda Battle Jordan. NOTE, This is not the clearest, tape it was made by the Genesee Count Courts,****What are they saying?Video ,See Part 1, {Judge Joseph Farah} May 02,, This is the Battle Vs Brenda Battle Case No. 00-227649-DM,Plaintiff {Attorney Damika L. Pace Byrd,} “Yes your honor, this is my clients motion ect., we tried several time’s to have her served by a process service but he could not find her for three days, so i did go on and sent it out through the mail I assumed that she would be here, but i see she’s not, so i’am asking the courts of your opinion on what to do, maybe we can put it off until Friday May 10, 02 { Judge Joseph Farah }”When was it mailed out { Attorney Damika L. Pace Byrd} It was mail out on May 2nd, {Judge Joseph Farah }Dose your client have the children with him”?{Attorney Damika L. Pace Byrd} Yes Mr. Battle did not allow her the last parenting time, {Judge Joseph Farah} ” I will continue,to treat this as a emergency , see if you can follow up on the servicing and we will have your emergency heard at 3:30 on Friday May 10, 02″….. [Friday May 10, 02] {Judge Joseph Farah } Who is your Attorney ? { Brenda Battle Jordan} “Attorney William J. Hayes, and he informed me today on a phone call that i have on tape, that i did not need to be in court today,” {Judge Joseph Farah} Is Hayes your Attorney now? then you want to call him up and let him know that Mrs.Pace Byrd is here right now ? { Brenda Battle Jordan}I did call him and he said ” that lady is down there now” that lady is crazy and i quit, you can come and get your money back” { Judge Joseph Farah }Have you talked to,Mr.Hayes? { Attorney Damika L. Pace Byrd} I did he said the time was not a good time. {Judge Joseph Farah}You can go in front of the Referee if you want on Monday or you can wait on Mr.Hayes , it fine with me”.{Attorney Damika L. Pace Byrd} And to my main request is to get the parenting time stoped”. {Judge Joseph Farah } I remember that,… somebody need to get Mr. Hayes….{ Brenda Battle Jordan} Well in that case i back to pro per repsenting myself …{Judge Joseph Farah }Okay have a seat and i will talk to everyone i need to at my 1st brake,This was part one and two of {Judge Joseph Farah }and the socalled Hitman case. {Part 3{,{Attorney William J. Hayes} Quit {Judge Preisal, May 6 2002}.{Part 4 of this Video The Hitman Case , Hearing…Heard by {Judge Preisal }Ken and Brenda Battle Jordan

The movie and the testimony to Congress should lead to justice for some of the victims like you. If you aren’t in the testimony presented to Congress, you will miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. We are going to have mainstream media coverage, and the film will be shown at Sundance and other major film festivals prior to being shown in theatres.

Law and The Common Person, The Battle Vs Brenda Battle Jordan Case,2001- 2003 UFM Flint Prof. Mars.& her Law Students Thanks
.by Brenda Battle Jordan on Friday, June 24, 2011 at 5:34am.

This is our court system, Jim was working on my court case, however, he called and told me he was told to get off the case, i have that call on youtube, so don’t come looking for it,we had a lot of help, Montel Williams, Tv Show.. Lifetime, Court tv,UFM Prof.Mars, who had her students working, on a class of” Law and The Common Person” my court case, they had all three years, …they got the call to get off the class

Study…i have UFM Flint Dr. Mars’s Call on tape she told me” From what i seen you won your case, but we wont be studying Law and the common person at this time”… Hmmm. Brenda Battle Jordan

Fraud On The Court By An Officer Of The Court”

Friday, June 24, 2011 1:19

“Fraud On The Court By An Officer Of The Court”
And “Disqualification Of Judges, State and Federal”
1. Who is an “officer of the court”?
2. What is “fraud on the court”?
3. What effect does an act of “fraud upon the court” have upon the court proceeding?
4. What causes the “Disqualification of Judges?”

——————————————————————————–

1. Who is an “officer of the court”?

A judge is an officer of the court, as well as are all attorneys. A state judge is a state judicial officer, paid by the State to act impartially and lawfully. A federal judge is a federal judicial officer, paid by the federal government to act impartially and lawfully. State and federal attorneys fall into the same general category and must meet the same requirements. A judge is not the court. People v. Zajic, 88 Ill.App.3d 477, 410 N.E.2d 626 (1980).

2. What is “fraud on the court”?

Whenever any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in “fraud upon the court”. In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated “Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.”
“Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication.” Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated “a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes final.”

3. What effect does an act of “fraud upon the court” have upon the court proceeding?

“Fraud upon the court” makes void the orders and judgments of that court.
It is also clear and well-settled Illinois law that any attempt to commit “fraud upon the court” vitiates the entire proceeding. The People of the State of Illinois v. Fred E. Sterling, 357 Ill. 354; 192 N.E. 229 (1934) (“The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters applies to judgments as well as to contracts and other transactions.”); Allen F. Moore v. Stanley F. Sievers, 336 Ill. 316; 168 N.E. 259 (1929) (“The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters …”); In re Village of Willowbrook, 37 Ill.App.2d 393 (1962) (“It is axiomatic that fraud vitiates everything.”); Dunham v. Dunham, 57 Ill.App. 475 (1894), affirmed 162 Ill. 589 (1896); Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 338 Ill.App. 79, 86 N.E.2d 875, 883-4 (1949); Thomas Stasel v. The American Home Security Corporation, 362 Ill. 350; 199 N.E. 798 (1935).
Under Illinois and Federal law, when any officer of the court has committed “fraud upon the court”, the orders and judgment of that court are void, of no legal force or effect.

4. What causes the “Disqualification of Judges?”

Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a Federal judge under certain circumstances.
In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge’s impartiality. If a judge’s attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified.” [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).
Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) (what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a) “is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.”) (“Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. §455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.”).
That Court also stated that Section 455(a) “requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that “It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice.”
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that “justice must satisfy the appearance of justice”, Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.
“Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).
Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that “We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed.” Balistrieri, at 1202.
Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his “appearance of partiality” which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an “appearance of partiality” and has possibly disqualified himself/herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law, and are of no legal force or effect.
Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) (“The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.”).
Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of “interference with interstate commerce”. The judge has acted in the judge’s personal capacity and not in the judge’s judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone’s next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge). However some judges may not follow the law.
If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an “appearance of partiality” and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.
However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states “disqualification is required” and that a judge “must be disqualified” under certain circumstances.
The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.
Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

Brenda Battle Jordan, Case 2001-2003
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHOYvZu_9QY&feature=sha,Brenda Battle Jordan http://www.youtube.com/embed/Ur5Si3X7D60?list=PL2g70nm7zm-YLlP6q25CCZJDov4f4u1IZ